1996-06-07 - Re: Multiple Remailers at a site?

Header Data

From: nelson@crynwr.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 34d54339c49e9bacf2f50e2f0a2eadeb1860b6fe83b709ede1fe1d2dc49d2a71
Message ID: <19960607121455.12742.qmail@ns.crynwr.com>
Reply To: <19960604232157.2053.qmail@ns.crynwr.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-07 16:36:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 00:36:37 +0800

Raw message

From: nelson@crynwr.com
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 00:36:37 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Multiple Remailers at a site?
In-Reply-To: <19960604232157.2053.qmail@ns.crynwr.com>
Message-ID: <19960607121455.12742.qmail@ns.crynwr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


nelson@crynwr.com writes:

 > Therefore, to keep the characteristics of the trusted host constant
 > when converting into a partially trusted network, each of the
 > individual hosts needs to increase their parameters by some amount
 > (which amount someone else will have to contribute, cuz I have no clue
 > and need sleep).

Ahhhh, sleep is a wonderful thing.  It clears the brain so well.  The
increase is proportional to the level of distrust of the individual
hosts by other hosts.  If you think half the hosts are TLS moles,
you'd double your characteristics (reordering and traffic).

-russ <nelson@crynwr.com>    http://www.crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr Software   | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | PGP ok
11 Grant St.      | +1 315 268 1925 voice | It's no mistake to err on
Potsdam, NY 13676 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX   | the side of freedom.





Thread