1996-07-18 - Re: Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.)
Header Data
From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
To: tc@mindvox.com>
Message Hash: 1bf5e98b23c1f6bd3b9bec4fb52edf57bd78572933c0c5956b239d8c1aebebee
Message ID: <olvNpd_00YUq14y=80@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960717082516.6065A-100000@phantom>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-18 05:03:07 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:03:07 +0800
Raw message
From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:03:07 +0800
To: tc@mindvox.com>
Subject: Re: Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960717082516.6065A-100000@phantom>
Message-ID: <olvNpd_00YUq14y=80@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 17-Jul-96 Intl consensus (was Re:
How.. by Dave Banisar@mindvox.com
> BTW. Those wizards at Wired have gotten our favorite spook Stewart Baker
> to write an article for an upcome issue talking about how the rest of the
> world save Japan loves key escrow and those big bad Japanese are
> thwarting the rest of the worlds "consensus". Its quite a load of
> inaccurate shit but our effort to rebut it was rejected by wired (I guess
> it wasnt trite enough for them).
Will anyone else be rebutting it?
-Declan
(not speaking for WIRED, first I heard of this)
Thread
- Return to July 1996
Return to February 1997
- Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
- Return to “Dave Banisar <tc@mindvox.com>”
- Return to “David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>”
- Return to “David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>”
- Return to ““Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>”
- Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
- Return to “Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>”
- Return to “Raph Levien <s_levien@research.att.com>”
- Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”
Return to “Yap Remailer <remailer@yap.pactitle.com>”
- 1996-07-15 (Mon, 15 Jul 1996 16:07:29 +0800) - How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
- 1996-07-15 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 01:25:19 +0800) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
- 1996-07-15 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 01:47:58 +0800) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
- 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 15:17:39 +0800) - Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.) - Dave Banisar <tc@mindvox.com>
- 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:03:07 +0800) - Re: Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.) - “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
- 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 15:17:39 +0800) - Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.) - Dave Banisar <tc@mindvox.com>
- 1996-07-15 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 03:08:24 +0800) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - Raph Levien <s_levien@research.att.com>
- 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 16:53:42 +0800) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
- 1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 19:20:47 +0800) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
- 1996-07-16 (Wed, 17 Jul 1996 01:01:32 +0800) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - David Sternlight <david@sternlight.com>
- 1996-07-18 (Thu, 18 Jul 1996 08:58:54 +0800) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - Yap Remailer <remailer@yap.pactitle.com>
- 1997-02-02 (Sat, 1 Feb 1997 23:50:25 -0800 (PST)) - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S. - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>