1996-07-18 - Re: Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.)

Header Data

From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
To: tc@mindvox.com>
Message Hash: 1bf5e98b23c1f6bd3b9bec4fb52edf57bd78572933c0c5956b239d8c1aebebee
Message ID: <olvNpd_00YUq14y=80@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960717082516.6065A-100000@phantom>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-18 05:03:07 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:03:07 +0800

Raw message

From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 13:03:07 +0800
To: tc@mindvox.com>
Subject: Re: Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960717082516.6065A-100000@phantom>
Message-ID: <olvNpd_00YUq14y=80@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 17-Jul-96 Intl consensus (was Re:
How.. by Dave Banisar@mindvox.com 
> BTW. Those wizards at Wired have gotten our favorite spook Stewart Baker 
> to write an article for an upcome issue talking about how the rest of the 
> world save Japan loves key escrow and those big bad Japanese are 
> thwarting the rest of the worlds "consensus". Its quite a load of 
> inaccurate shit but our effort to rebut it was rejected by wired (I guess 
> it wasnt trite enough for them).

Will anyone else be rebutting it?

-Declan
(not speaking for WIRED, first I heard of this)






Thread