cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-07-15 - Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.

Header Data

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Message Hash: ffaf6c9542be5b229aa3270abc0fe44f3caa11170fdc090d8d287e67bc5b373a
Message ID: <199607151322.JAA05857@nrk.com>
Reply To: <ae0efb9f020210046227@[205.199.118.202]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-15 17:25:19 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 01:25:19 +0800

Raw message

From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 01:25:19 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Subject: Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.
In-Reply-To: <ae0efb9f020210046227@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199607151322.JAA05857@nrk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Tim May:
> 
> At 12:18 AM 7/15/96, Dave Banisar wrote:
> >Its now up at http://www.epic.org/crypto/key_escrow/wh_cke_796.html
{}
> The report speaks of an "emerging consensus" (for key escrow). I see just
> the opposite, unless the report is speaking only of the U.S. intelligence
> and law enforcement community....{}
{}
> So, who is in this "emerging consensus"?

Don't be so sure the FI community has any consensus within *its*
ranks, much less with the LE community. I've heard comments from
insiders that were 180 out with that concept.

[Not to mention that, in general, intercene warfare in the
Community is a much-practiced art.]

-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433

Thread