From: Dave Banisar <tc@mindvox.com>
To: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Message Hash: 59e9853cde32b32f556e04ce448c5539c7a4159b75dcbca6c837c6078cf678f3
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960717082516.6065A-100000@phantom>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960715100239.25657F-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-18 07:17:39 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 15:17:39 +0800
From: Dave Banisar <tc@mindvox.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 15:17:39 +0800
To: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Subject: Intl consensus (was Re: How I Would Ban Strong Crypto in the U.S.)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960715100239.25657F-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960717082516.6065A-100000@phantom>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Not really. At the last OECD meeting in Paris a couple of weeks ago,
there was no great love by quite a few countries for key escrow. The
scandavian countries were pretty united against and all sorts of other
raised objections. (tho some of those objections were to the US
ramrodding key escrow through OECD).
BTW. Those wizards at Wired have gotten our favorite spook Stewart Baker
to write an article for an upcome issue talking about how the rest of the
world save Japan loves key escrow and those big bad Japanese are
thwarting the rest of the worlds "consensus". Its quite a load of
inaccurate shit but our effort to rebut it was rejected by wired (I guess
it wasnt trite enough for them).
-d
On Mon, 15 Jul 1996, Michael Froomkin wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jul 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:
>
> > So, who is in this "emerging consensus"?
> >
> Foreign governments?
> (Process of elimination, not inside info...)
>
>
>
> A. Michael Froomkin | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
> Associate Professor of Law |
> U. Miami School of Law | froomkin@law.miami.edu
> P.O. Box 248087 | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
> Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | It's hot here. And humid.
>
>
>
Return to February 1997
Return to “Yap Remailer <remailer@yap.pactitle.com>”