1996-09-13 - Re: who can count?

Header Data

From: “Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>
To: HipCrime <robert@precipice.v-site.net>
Message Hash: 01b5ebd9af66658dd2d86e09d9fe760bcdeba3e5b2e5f1723289c997b94bbf03
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9609122103.A23562-0100000@netcom12>
Reply To: <3238B18E.7211@precipice.v-site.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-13 06:55:28 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 14:55:28 +0800

Raw message

From: "Z.B." <zachb@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 14:55:28 +0800
To: HipCrime <robert@precipice.v-site.net>
Subject: Re: who can count?
In-Reply-To: <3238B18E.7211@precipice.v-site.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9609122103.A23562-0100000@netcom12>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 12 Sep 1996, HipCrime wrote:

> > No, this b.s. is more like having someone put a dead skunk in my 
> > mailbox, with no return address, trying to prevent me from sending 
> > them 100 dead skunks as a return favor. And about as welcome.
> 
> 100 dead skunks in exchange for ONE is exactly what this discussion
> is all about.  You CypherWIMPS just love over-kill.  EmailRobot sent
> ONE message to EACH address.  Are you guys so unskilled in arithmetic
> to understand the difference between 1 and 100?
> 

It doesn't matter if you get one or one hundred messages - both are still 
annoying as hell.  If I wanted whatever you're advertising or selling, 
I'd come look for it.  I'd prefer that you not mail me.


---

Zach Babayco

zachb@netcom.com  <----- finger for PGP public key
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/4127







Thread