1996-09-13 - who can count?
Header Data
From: HipCrime <robert@precipice.v-site.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b5c8f999f87f7da07d112fde03b732907f96054c0ba6b002064b62c32df2063c
Message ID: <3238B18E.7211@precipice.v-site.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-13 03:25:43 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 11:25:43 +0800
Raw message
From: HipCrime <robert@precipice.v-site.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 11:25:43 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: who can count?
Message-ID: <3238B18E.7211@precipice.v-site.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> No, this b.s. is more like having someone put a dead skunk in my
> mailbox, with no return address, trying to prevent me from sending
> them 100 dead skunks as a return favor. And about as welcome.
100 dead skunks in exchange for ONE is exactly what this discussion
is all about. You CypherWIMPS just love over-kill. EmailRobot sent
ONE message to EACH address. Are you guys so unskilled in arithmetic
to understand the difference between 1 and 100?
One message is NOT spam, 100 messages to a single box IS spamming.
-- HTTP://www.HIPCRIME.com
Thread
Return to September 1996
- Return to “HipCrime <robert@precipice.v-site.net>”
- Return to “Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>”
- Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”
Return to ““Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>”
- 1996-09-13 (Fri, 13 Sep 1996 11:25:43 +0800) - who can count? - HipCrime <robert@precipice.v-site.net>
- 1996-09-13 (Fri, 13 Sep 1996 14:55:28 +0800) - Re: who can count? - “Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>
- 1996-09-13 (Fri, 13 Sep 1996 15:04:29 +0800) - Re: who can count? - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
- 1996-09-16 (Mon, 16 Sep 1996 13:59:24 +0800) - Re: who can count? - snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>