From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: HipCrime <robert@precipice.v-site.net>
Message Hash: 1f5afbdeaaf1f2fd339d73f0c8f89394f60176e029df3dd9cd051f462005fcbb
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960915183458.1513Q-100000@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <3238B18E.7211@precipice.v-site.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-16 05:59:24 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 13:59:24 +0800
From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 1996 13:59:24 +0800
To: HipCrime <robert@precipice.v-site.net>
Subject: Re: who can count?
In-Reply-To: <3238B18E.7211@precipice.v-site.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960915183458.1513Q-100000@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thu, 12 Sep 1996, HipCrime wrote:
> > No, this b.s. is more like having someone put a dead skunk in my
> > mailbox, with no return address, trying to prevent me from sending
> > them 100 dead skunks as a return favor. And about as welcome.
> 100 dead skunks in exchange for ONE is exactly what this discussion
> is all about. You CypherWIMPS just love over-kill. EmailRobot sent
> ONE message to EACH address. Are you guys so unskilled in arithmetic
> to understand the difference between 1 and 100?
> One message is NOT spam, 100 messages to a single box IS spamming.
One mesage sent to 100 addresses, unsoliciated IS spam. One message
sent to One address isn't. It IS still junk mail.
Overkill is a time honored concept for making sure the job is done.
Petro, Christopher C.
petro@suba.com <prefered for any non-list stuff>
snow@smoke.suba.com
Return to September 1996
Return to ““Z.B.” <zachb@netcom.com>”