cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-12-03 - Re: [NOISE]– [PHILOSOPHYPUNKS] Re: The House Rules At The Permanent Virtual Cypherpunks Party

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: Paul Foley <mycroft@actrix.gen.nz>
Message Hash: e6b5322d1dcf78be30c45ffe8926b29254e3cafd30b226dbef809744aec6ec2d
Message ID: <32A44861.3619@gte.net>
Reply To: <199612031405.DAA02486@mycroft.actrix.gen.nz>
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-03 15:34:16 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 07:34:16 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 07:34:16 -0800 (PST)
To: Paul Foley <mycroft@actrix.gen.nz>
Subject: Re: [NOISE]-- [PHILOSOPHYPUNKS] Re: The House Rules At The Permanent Virtual Cypherpunks Party
In-Reply-To: <199612031405.DAA02486@mycroft.actrix.gen.nz>
Message-ID: <32A44861.3619@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Paul Foley wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Dec 1996 21:34:14 -0800, Dale Thorn wrote:
>    Bryce wrote:
>    > whatever letters you want; you don't have the right to demand
>    > that any particular thing be _done_ with those letters once
>    > they arrive, in the absence of some contract to the contrary.

>    In the interest of reducing the amount of argument, let's speak more
>    precisely:  I think people *do* have the right to demand such a thing,

> Do you indeed?  OK, I hereby demand that you set up a mailing list on
> your computer for discussion of "censorship" on cypherpunks.

I hear your demand, which you have a right to make, and I reject it,
which is my right. You proved my point, that you could make the demand,
and I further proved it, by saying no.  Is that clear enough?

[other similar drivel snipped]

Thread