From: aga <aga@dhp.com>
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Message Hash: 0d249d4bd42e804b59c26c3d85f2d4504b057f1c60885b46278bfa48b755649a
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970119090855.7506J-100000@dhp.com>
Reply To: <199701190526.XAA00327@manifold.algebra.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-19 14:10:42 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 06:10:42 -0800 (PST)
From: aga <aga@dhp.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 06:10:42 -0800 (PST)
To: freedom-knights@jetcafe.org
Subject: Re: Monitoring the monitors [Was: Gilmore and Sandfart suck big dicks]
In-Reply-To: <199701190526.XAA00327@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970119090855.7506J-100000@dhp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, 18 Jan 1997, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
> Bryan Reece wrote:
> >
> > Dale Thorn wrote:
> > >
> > > Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
> > > > Someone wrote to me:
> > > > >Did you not mean any homo who has ever shaffted Gilmore and Sandy can
> > > > >write what the fuck they like but straight or intelligent or NORMAL
> > > > >people will have to be filtered.
> > >
> > > > Yes, that's precisely how Sandfart's moderation will work. Homosexuals
> > > > like Jason Durbin will continue to post personal attacks on Gilmore's
> > > > many "enemies", but the victims of the libel will not be able to respond
> > > > and refute their lies. The concept of "the best response to speech you
> > > > don't like is more speech" is totally alien to the homosexual subculture
> > > > on the Internet. These control freaks are into censorship and B&D.
> > >
> > > Here's a problem. I don't have "technical" capabilities in the area of
> > > communications software, and I have too full a plate to start studying
> > > now. But, I/we need to monitor the "moderator", to make sure he doesn't
> > > allow people to attack others, then cut the responses.
> > >
> > > If he does this, and he doesn't rectify it when it's called to his
> > > attention, he would need to be punished in some way. One of the
> > > questions I have is, how do I know what's cut when all I subscribe to
> > > is the uncensored list? I do *not* want to subscribe to the filtered
> > > list plus the "flames" list, out of principle. Is this something that
> > > would be forced on me/us in order to monitor the censorship?
> > >
> > > In other words, can I separate the censored email without having to
> > > have two accounts?
> > >
> >
> > it is easy undex unix, what you have to do is store arriving article
> > in separate directories by message ID and run diff (with certain
> > corrections) on these two directories.
> >
> > diff will print you the files that are in one dir and not in another.
> >
> > take an extraction, and delete too new articles (so that propagation
> > does not screw you up).
> >
> > thats it
> >
> > If you just want the differences and aren't too concerned with
> > timeliness, I'm planning on running a cypherpunks-rejects list containing all
> > the messages that went out the unedited list but didn't show up on the
> > moderated one within x hours (not sure what x should be yet).
> >
>
> a lot, since moderators sleep, eat, go to movies, etc.
>
> - Igor.
>
But x should be no more than 24.
Return to January 1997
Return to “Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>”