1997-01-20 - Re: Monitoring the monitors [Was: Gilmore and Sandfart suck big dicks]

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: aga <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: b763b1e68f9ed108aabd55c72a2bfc063a2e484fd694950eb8719bd0499fb48d
Message ID: <32E2CC4B.22C9@gte.net>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970119085107.7506H-100000@dhp.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-20 01:37:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 17:37:48 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 17:37:48 -0800 (PST)
To: aga <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Monitoring the monitors [Was: Gilmore and Sandfart suck big dicks]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970119085107.7506H-100000@dhp.com>
Message-ID: <32E2CC4B.22C9@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


aga wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:
> > Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:

> > In other words, can I separate the censored email without having to
> > have two accounts?

> You can not.  You need another account.
> I wrote to Steve Case about this censorship problem, and I am waiting
> for him to respond.
> Do you want another account to get the censored list at?

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.  We already get the censored stuff
on the alleged-to-be "unedited" list, so by looking at the censored
list only, we can do the subtraction more reliably than Sandfort.

Just the censored list is needed, not the cut-out stuff, as far as I know.






Thread