1997-01-15 - Re: Newt’s phone calls

Header Data

From: michael.tighe@Central.Sun.COM (Michael Tighe SUN IMP)
To: abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
Message Hash: 3574941117131ac9d7b2ecc76cab3c25227bea2ff15f7982cbe98357d9c44f09
Message ID: <199701151811.MAA11019@dallas2.Central.Sun.COM>
Reply To: <Pine.3.89.9701141425.A3919-0100000@netcom18>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-15 19:03:08 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 11:03:08 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: michael.tighe@Central.Sun.COM (Michael Tighe SUN IMP)
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 11:03:08 -0800 (PST)
To: abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
Subject: Re: Newt's phone calls
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9701141425.A3919-0100000@netcom18>
Message-ID: <199701151811.MAA11019@dallas2.Central.Sun.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Alan Bostick writes:

>It is also possible that somewhere in the chain of information between
>mom&pop, the media, and us, the distinction between "cordless phone"
>and cellular phone.  I gather it was a conference call that was 
>intercepted.  All it takes is one participant using a cordless phone in 
>range of one scanner, and the whole conversation is compromised.

Yes, a conference call (and we do know there were multiple participants)
over a cordless makes sense.






Thread