1998-09-10 - Re: radio net (fwd)

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 8e981d81edcbb3fed9f25341038514cfc583ce679225156c35d1e36f1009cc72
Message ID: <3.0.5.32.19980910141331.00cd0b60@idiom.com>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809090755430.270-100000@smarter.than.nu>
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-10 11:07:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 19:07:51 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 19:07:51 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: radio net (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809090755430.270-100000@smarter.than.nu>
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980910141331.00cd0b60@idiom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>> > The FCC prohibits the transmission of encrypted data via analog or digital
>> > signals by amateurs.
>> I'd love to see them try to enforce that.  What about chaffing and
>> winnowing?  Stego?  Transmission of random noise? ;)  Anyone have the text
>> of the actual rules concerning this?

Put it like this, it took the Feds a long time to be willing to accept
RTTY (Radio Teletype), because it used this 7(?)-bit ASCII CODE stuff.
On the other hand, they've relaxed a lot, as amateurs have largely become
computer hackers as well, equipment changed, Morse became less relevant....
As long as the ham user community doesn't get annoyed at you,
and you don't abuse the available bandwidth, you ought to be able to stego
a certain amount of traffic through the net, either using some sort of
PointyHairedBoss code, or low-order bits in GIFs, or whatever.


				Thanks! 
					Bill
Bill Stewart, bill.stewart@pobox.com
PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF  3C85 B884 0ABE 4639





Thread