cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1998-09-09 - Re: radio net (fwd)

Header Data

From: “Brian W. Buchanan” <brian@smarter.than.nu>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Message Hash: c1bee5db0d310d61418fede2febdb81f3682dd3ca8b12fb42e60348e950ac610
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809090755430.270-100000@smarter.than.nu>
Reply To: <199809091239.HAA15369@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-09 15:12:05 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 23:12:05 +0800

Raw message

From: "Brian W. Buchanan" <brian@smarter.than.nu>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 23:12:05 +0800
To: Jim Choate <ravage@einstein.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: radio net (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199809091239.HAA15369@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9809090755430.270-100000@smarter.than.nu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Jim Choate wrote:

> > Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 00:51:49 -0700
> > From: "William J. Hartwell" <billh@ibag.com>
> > Subject: Re: radio net
> 
> > I think a radio network linked to the Amateur networks sending secure
> > packets, 
> > using tunneling or maybe just encrypted traffic (There may be some FCC
> > rules regarding this.
> 
> The FCC prohibits the transmission of encrypted data via analog or digital
> signals by amateurs.

I'd love to see them try to enforce that.  What about chaffing and
winnowing?  Stego?  Transmission of random noise? ;)  Anyone have the text
of the actual rules concerning this?

-- 
Brian Buchanan                                      brian@smarter.than.nu

Never believe that you know the whole story.

Thread