1998-09-10 - Re: radio net (fwd)

Header Data

From: phelix@vallnet.com
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: cb02847cbd224da482e33f6d669b097bebce266a82bee338143c24e2c5bb95dc
Message ID: <35f871f9.173776779@news>
Reply To: <199809091239.HAA15369@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-10 11:43:23 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 19:43:23 +0800

Raw message

From: phelix@vallnet.com
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 19:43:23 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: radio net (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199809091239.HAA15369@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <35f871f9.173776779@news>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On 10 Sep 1998 17:51:31 -0500, Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com> wrote:

>If you want to know what crypto regs and net use regs are going to look
>like in 10-20 years, look at the amateur radio regs now - we'll have
>citizens' committees (similar to the "block leaders" on GeoCities) who stay
>up late at night, unpaid, watching their fellow subjects for signs of
>pseudonym use, or the use of unlicensed/unapproved crypto, or "unlicensed
>Internet broadcasting".

Are we already seing this, with CAUCE and USENET II?  Good users are known
users (... and if it stops just one spammer...)

-- Phelix





Thread