1995-02-09 - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway…
Header Data
From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
To: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Message Hash: 1061ceb10c4a5b9379d75069cadc361deaad512be0fc0b997088f52a5bdd5d9f
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950208204415.11813A-100000@jaguar.zoo.cs.yale.edu>
Reply To: <199502090123.TAA01134@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 01:44:38 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:44:38 PST
Raw message
From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:44:38 PST
To: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Subject: Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
In-Reply-To: <199502090123.TAA01134@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950208204415.11813A-100000@jaguar.zoo.cs.yale.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, root wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A friend advises me that today House Bill 666 passed. This supposedly would
> allow police officers to use evidence collected illegaly if they 'believed'
> that it was collected in good faith.
This sounds like a spoof. Look at the number.
Ben.
Thread
Return to February 1995
- Return to “Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>”
- Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>”
- Return to “Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>”
- Return to “Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>”
- Return to “joshua geller <joshua@dee.retix.com>”
- Return to ““L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>”
- Return to “Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>”
- Return to “root <root@einstein.ssz.com>”
- Return to “slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>”
Return to “Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>”
- 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:28:24 PST) - Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
- 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:44:38 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
- 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:21:35 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
- 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:29:57 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
- 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:58:03 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
- 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:53:14 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
- 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:02:48 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
- 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:10:31 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
- 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:59:22 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
- 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:13:00 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - joshua geller <joshua@dee.retix.com>
- 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 15:03:44 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
- 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:13:00 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - joshua geller <joshua@dee.retix.com>
- 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:15:31 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>
- 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:50:54 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
- 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:14:24 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>
- 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:44:38 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>