1995-02-09 - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway…

Header Data

From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 12a12f815b6f06ce76b2d70bd53bcea6a7c4401b77b29ed80a393ee5e2049f32
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950209100901.12976A-100000@jaguar.zoo.cs.yale.edu>
Reply To: <199502091502.KAA27022@libws4.ic.sunysb.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 15:10:31 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:10:31 PST

Raw message

From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:10:31 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
In-Reply-To: <199502091502.KAA27022@libws4.ic.sunysb.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950209100901.12976A-100000@jaguar.zoo.cs.yale.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 9 Feb 1995, Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl wrote:

> > On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, root wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > A friend advises me that today House Bill 666 passed. This supposedly would
> > > allow police officers to use evidence collected illegaly if they 'believed'
> > > that it was collected in good faith.
> > 
> > This sounds like a spoof.  Look at the number.

I regret that my previous hope was dead wrong.

There's  front page story on it in today's NYT.  Hopefully for those of 
you that are NYT challenged, maybe John Young will make it available as 
per his usual gracious self.

Shit!

Ben.






Thread