1995-02-09 - Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway…

Header Data

From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9d1e95be3969ef4b364caf965e6ebc9fa7edcbb95b61f0dae6325fbaf0698469
Message ID: <199502090123.TAA01134@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 01:28:24 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:28:24 PST

Raw message

From: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:28:24 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
Message-ID: <199502090123.TAA01134@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Hi all,

A friend advises me that today House Bill 666 passed. This supposedly would
allow police officers to use evidence collected illegaly if they 'believed'
that it was collected in good faith.

Any word on it?

Thanks.

Thread

• Return to February 1995

• Return to “Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>”
• Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>”
• Return to “Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>”
• Return to “Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>”
• Return to “joshua geller <joshua@dee.retix.com>”
• Return to ““L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>”
• Return to “Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>”
• Return to “root <root@einstein.ssz.com>”
• Return to “slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>”

• Return to “Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>”

• 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:28:24 PST) - Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 17:44:38 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:21:35 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Thomas Grant Edwards <tedwards@src.umd.edu>
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:29:57 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - “L. McCarthy” <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu>
      • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:58:03 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
    • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:53:14 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:02:48 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
      • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:10:31 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
      • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 07:59:22 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>
        • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:13:00 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - joshua geller <joshua@dee.retix.com>
          • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 15:03:44 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>
    • 1995-02-09 (Thu, 9 Feb 95 08:15:31 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Greg Morgan <mac5tgm@hibbs.vcu.edu>
  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:50:54 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
  • 1995-02-09 (Wed, 8 Feb 95 19:14:24 PST) - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway… - Brad Dolan <bdolan@use.usit.net>