cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1995-02-09 - Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway…

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
To: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Message Hash: 702e6c860489b6fe8bf071d5d53d5b5ae0447de4cf784925245c5e2b0991e47f
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950208215120.14387B-100000@access4.digex.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950208204415.11813A-100000@jaguar.zoo.cs.yale.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1995-02-09 02:53:14 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:53:14 PST

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 95 18:53:14 PST
To: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
Subject: Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950208204415.11813A-100000@jaguar.zoo.cs.yale.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950208215120.14387B-100000@access4.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, Ben wrote:

> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 1995 20:44:27 -0500 (EST)
> From: Ben <samman@CS.YALE.EDU>
> To: root <root@einstein.ssz.com>
> Cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
> Subject: Re: Not necessarily crypto but scary anyway...
> 
> On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, root wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > A friend advises me that today House Bill 666 passed. This supposedly would
> > allow police officers to use evidence collected illegaly if they 'believed'
> > that it was collected in good faith.
> 
> This sounds like a spoof.  Look at the number.

This would amuse me, as the spoofer would have, in trying to come up with 
an intimidating law that would result in public outrage, instead hit upon 
the current doctrine.

Truth stranger than fiction?

I do seem, however, to recall some mention of legislative clairification 
of the doctrine, so I suspect it to be legitimate.

> 
> Ben.
> 
> 

-uni- (Dark)

--
073BB885A786F666 nemo repente fuit turpissimus - potestas scientiae in usu est
6E6D4506F6EDBC17 quaere verum ad infinitum, loquitur sub rosa    -    wichtig!

Thread