1995-10-23 - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler

Header Data

From: anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1040da087aed12a2b96d10f0a9420a286a665133faf770a4a742db39e4de27e5
Message ID: <199510232223.XAA19030@utopia.hacktic.nl>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951021145844.29391F-100000@eskimo.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-23 22:24:02 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 15:24:02 PDT

Raw message

From: anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 15:24:02 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951021145844.29391F-100000@eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <199510232223.XAA19030@utopia.hacktic.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tatu Ylonen (ylo@cs.hut.fi) wrote:
> You are aware that RSADSI claims they have exclusive licensing rights
> for DSA?

You are aware that Bidzos is full of shit?

Roger Schafly (sp?) addresses this issue in his lawsuit.  Hopefully this 
will be resolved soon.  The only problem is that Bidzo has made this claim 
on patents in other countries, not just USA, so he'd probably have to be 
sued throughout Europe also...  He sure does do a good job of making 
himself a pain in the ass even when he knows he's wrong.

Anyway, you could use ElGamal signatures instead, it is not patented.
The D-H and H-M patents do not cover digital signatures.





Thread