From: someone <zxmjn11@here.or.there>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f2781dcdfedb1b18bb4d39a91c6c6ee27c90715a23b524cdeea2e7a63270f9eb
Message ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.951028021729.17430B-100000@hp24.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951023022123.9641C-100000@eskimo.com>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-28 01:47:24 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 09:47:24 +0800
From: someone <zxmjn11@here.or.there>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 1995 09:47:24 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951023022123.9641C-100000@eskimo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.951028021729.17430B-100000@hp24.zdv.uni-tuebingen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Hi,
i am using a prog called twinsock to have an internet connection via my
shell account. The program provides a winsock for my windows progs and it
comes with the complete source. When I first started to use it, I thought
that it must be fairly easy to add some packet encryption to this
program. But then I realized that it wouldnt work over a tcp/ip
connection, only over a telephone line. But maybe the twinsock code might
be a good starting point for some encrypting winsock. Unfortunately, I am
not a good enough programmer to estimate how much work it is to come up
with such an enhanced winsock or even start to make one myself.
Stephan
Return to October 1995
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”