1995-10-23 - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler

Header Data

From: Eric Young <eay@mincom.oz.au>
To: Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
Message Hash: 6acbf77155caf4f2f157a8ba0f7f73bac638ca38e5ee73263ae3e20cfa222b19
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951023192908.6735B-100000@orb>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951023161515.27409A-100000@ima.net>
UTC Datetime: 1995-10-23 09:33:59 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 02:33:59 PDT

Raw message

From: Eric Young <eay@mincom.oz.au>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 95 02:33:59 PDT
To: Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
Subject: Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.951023161515.27409A-100000@ima.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951023192908.6735B-100000@orb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Mon, 23 Oct 1995, Enzo Michelangeli wrote:
> Adding MD5 support wouldn't be a bad idea. Same for algorithms 
> alternative to Blowfish (3DES etc.) and DH (e.g., with Elliptic 
> functions-based key exchange), all automatically negotiated at connection 
> time.

Starting to sound like you want the crypto layer to be SSL (v3 for DH) or
PCT :-).

eric

Thread

• Return to October 1995

• Return to “anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)”
• Return to “Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>”
• Return to “Eric Young <eay@mincom.oz.au>”
• Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
• Return to “Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
• Return to “sameer <sameer@c2.org>”
• Return to “someone <zxmjn11@here.or.there>”
• Return to “Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>”

• Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”

• 1995-10-21 (Sat, 21 Oct 95 15:18:21 PDT) - Encrypted TCP Tunneler - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
  • 1995-10-22 (Sat, 21 Oct 95 18:03:58 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
    • 1995-10-22 (Sat, 21 Oct 95 19:33:33 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
      • 1995-10-22 (Sat, 21 Oct 95 20:54:59 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
        • 1995-10-22 (Sat, 21 Oct 95 23:33:14 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - Mark <mark@lochard.com.au>
          • 1995-10-22 (Sun, 22 Oct 95 00:45:39 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - sameer <sameer@c2.org>
    • 1995-10-22 (Sun, 22 Oct 95 00:29:35 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
  • 1995-10-22 (Sun, 22 Oct 95 10:03:45 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1995-10-22 (Sun, 22 Oct 95 16:49:15 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>
    • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 01:58:45 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
      • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 02:33:59 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - Eric Young <eay@mincom.oz.au>
    • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 02:53:19 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
      • 1995-10-24 (Tue, 24 Oct 95 09:13:40 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>
      • 1995-10-28 (Sat, 28 Oct 1995 09:47:24 +0800) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - someone <zxmjn11@here.or.there>
  • 1995-10-23 (Mon, 23 Oct 95 15:24:02 PDT) - Re: Encrypted TCP Tunneler - anon-remailer@utopia.hacktic.nl (Anonymous)