1996-07-13 - Re: Can’t block caller ID in Massachusetts?

Header Data

From: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
To: alanh@infi.net (Alan Horowitz)
Message Hash: 4be9338c93b123477dfa74973fcf08621f2f024490089d662f5dc5060ab5d34a
Message ID: <199607130024.RAA31724@slack.lne.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960712191424.22163H-100000@larry.infi.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-13 05:20:15 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 13:20:15 +0800

Raw message

From: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 1996 13:20:15 +0800
To: alanh@infi.net (Alan Horowitz)
Subject: Re: Can't block caller ID in Massachusetts?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960712191424.22163H-100000@larry.infi.net>
Message-ID: <199607130024.RAA31724@slack.lne.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Alan Horowitz writes:
> 
> > Caller ID isn't for people, it's for businesses who want to
> > track callers.  They're willing to pay for that service, enough
> 
> 
>    Privacy isn't for parasites. 

800 numbers aren't free.  They're just paid out
of a different account.  I don't pay for them
directly, but I do indirectly through the increased
prices of the goods and services sold by the
company with the 800 number.  I'd hardly call
that being a 'parasite'.

> It's for people who are willing to pay for
>    their own phone calls. 

Too bad there's not always a choice, a lot
of companies use only 800 numbers for service
hotlines etc.

-- 
Eric Murray  ericm@lne.com  ericm@motorcycle.com  http://www.lne.com/ericm
PGP keyid:E03F65E5 fingerprint:50 B0 A2 4C 7D 86 FC 03  92 E8 AC E6 7E 27 29 AF





Thread