1996-07-14 - Re: Can’t block caller ID in Massachusetts?

Header Data

From: “sfuze@tiac.net” <sfuze@sunspot.tiac.net>
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: d64f9a573b5a997b06adc52929c4353bc5ba4a801847522ac6867553efb2ae27
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960713164442.13725A-100000@sunspot.tiac.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960713073643.20814A-100000@crl9.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-14 00:38:39 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 08:38:39 +0800

Raw message

From: "sfuze@tiac.net" <sfuze@sunspot.tiac.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 08:38:39 +0800
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: Can't block caller ID in Massachusetts?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960713073643.20814A-100000@crl9.crl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960713164442.13725A-100000@sunspot.tiac.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Re: Prepaid Calling Cards --

This might work with some telemarketing companies, but I certainly 
wouldn't be passing on anything of worth.

Especially something which might be construed as "wrong" by any legal 
authorities.

While I doubt any telemarketers would go to such great lengths to find 
out who you are, you are indeed passing along a nice dossier of numbers 
to whomever the calling card company chooses to disburse such info to.


Be wary.

And for godsakes, if you are that paranoid, use a payphone 50 miles away.

I'd never use a cellular to place a call of importance anyway.

We all know how easily cellular can be intercepted, I hope...  And EVERY 
number you ever call on a cellular is logged too.

Quid pro quo,
Millie






Thread