1996-07-14 - Re: Can’t block caller ID in Massachusetts?

Header Data

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
To: “Bruce M.” <bkmarsh@feist.com>
Message Hash: fcc09af5440c9b0cb2328ab48321ca8d1b8b110098339a89c226e88efc6336fc
Message ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960713201318.16808C-100000@larry.infi.net>
Reply To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960713082927.14968A-100000@wichita.fn.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-14 03:52:05 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 11:52:05 +0800

Raw message

From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 11:52:05 +0800
To: "Bruce M." <bkmarsh@feist.com>
Subject: Re: Can't block caller ID in Massachusetts?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960713082927.14968A-100000@wichita.fn.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960713201318.16808C-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> >    Privacy isn't for parasites. It's for people who are willing to pay for
> >    their own phone calls. 
> 
>     That is interesting as I don't recall ever being offered a choice of 
> toll free or being billed when I dial an 800 number (sometimes the only 
> number offered for a company).


 I haven't noticed too many business telephones that don't appear in 
Directory Assistance.





Thread