cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-01-11 - Re: another idea?

Header Data

From: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
To: bad@uhf.wireless.net (Bernie Doehner)
Message Hash: 6cf0663d683c3ec1e3f43b58cf4c4d0f3fef121d913cc6e85d38211f1a69ab9e
Message ID: <199701111710.JAA08932@slack.lne.com>
Reply To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970111112441.602B-100000@uhf.wdc.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-11 17:11:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 09:11:40 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Eric Murray <ericm@lne.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 09:11:40 -0800 (PST)
To: bad@uhf.wireless.net (Bernie Doehner)
Subject: Re: another idea?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970111112441.602B-100000@uhf.wdc.net>
Message-ID: <199701111710.JAA08932@slack.lne.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Bernie Doehner writes:
> 
> Hi again:
> 
> Upon rereading comments in favor of no moderation, it occured to me that a
> possible solution that will make most people  happy:
> 
> How about, we have
> cypherpunks-raw: unmoderated 110% SPAM
> cypherpunks: moderated by Sandy and other moderator.

That was the original proposal.
Now that the 'discussion' has come around full circle, can we
stop talking about it and DO it?


-- 
Eric Murray  ericm@lne.com  ericm@motorcycle.com  http://www.lne.com/ericm
PGP keyid:E03F65E5 fingerprint:50 B0 A2 4C 7D 86 FC 03  92 E8 AC E6 7E 27 29 AF

Thread