1997-11-15 - Re: Tim May’s offensive racism (was: about RC4)

Header Data

From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 3b51157d34d205772040dcfb9d0c89fe2f029cb5a33a41f15f5541ce848d3afd
Message ID: <62c0ce046ea812e50882fefc2a6c5667@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-11-15 02:00:43 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 10:00:43 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 10:00:43 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Tim May's offensive racism (was: about RC4)
Message-ID: <62c0ce046ea812e50882fefc2a6c5667@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Tim May <tcmay@got.net> wrote:

> At 10:37 PM -0700 11/12/97, Nobuki Nakatuji wrote:
> >There are RC4 sourcecode in ftp.replay.com.
> >but, Is it  same RC4 developed RSADSI ?
> >
> 
> It am developed.
> 
> You go back where you came. You go back hotmail. We tired your stupid
> questions on RC4 and your Misty posts.
> 
> Sayonara!
> 
> (And they wonder why we kicked Japan's butt.)


Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk> writes:

> As for white supremacy, look elsewhere, I think you`ll 
> find Tim`s post an example of what the developed world knows as humour, 
> not a serious attack on any ethnic group.

Tim May's post seems funny to you?  Not a racist comment?

His imitation of a Japanese accent is purely offensive.  Paul, would
you feel comfortable offering this kind of "humor" in a gathering which
included Japanese visitors, perhaps potential customers?  That comment
about kicking Japan's butt would really be humorous, wouldn't it?

It is astonishing that people like you and William Geiger, who apparently
make their living as consultants, feel so comfortable publicly approving
racist comments directed against the Japanese.  Does William expect ever
to work with a Japanese customer, after suggesting that Truman should
have dropped additional atomic bombs on Japan?

Even if you share Tim May's lack of moral constraint, you presumably do
not also share his wealth.  Pragmatic considerations alone should make
you reluctant to be an apologist for racist comments, or in William's
case to compound the error with shockingly offensive remarks of his own.






Thread