From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
To: honig@otc.net>
Message Hash: 5799a2bb0713d93c5657e97bd42f8bd34d0478be00e57f36600b356ad8fb6e73
Message ID: <v03102805b0c4e8e2decb@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply To: <3.0.5.32.19971222100447.007d28c0@otc.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-23 05:21:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 13:21:13 +0800
From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 13:21:13 +0800
To: honig@otc.net>
Subject: Re: SPECIAL REPORT: Censorware in the Stacks
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19971222100447.007d28c0@otc.net>
Message-ID: <v03102805b0c4e8e2decb@[207.167.93.63]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 9:13 PM -0700 12/22/97, Paul Spirito wrote:
>It's true that in the absence of public libraries this would not be an
>issue; however, it is an example of the state acting as sovereign, not
>employer. We're concerned with the right of patrons to access material, &
>they are not state employees. The situation is analogous to a public park:
>just because the state owns it, does that mean it can forbid, say, criticism
>of the state in it? No, of course not, though it has broader discretion in
>limiting the speech of public employees in the park, while on-duty.
Well, to move this away from First Amendment issues, for the sake of
novelty, I know of several nearby state-owned parks (literally) which
forbid discharge of firearms or even carrying of firearms.
Whither the Second Amendment? (Or has it withered?)
--Tim May
The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^2,976,221 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
Return to December 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”