From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5903e88da25fd4805c109e842115665cf84055360f4521711d8f665e4c13af26
Message ID: <v03007801b0bddf5a7151@[168.161.105.216]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-12-19 00:23:18 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 08:23:18 +0800
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 1997 08:23:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment
Message-ID: <v03007801b0bddf5a7151@[168.161.105.216]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tuesday I stopped by the Freedom Forum's conference, where they released
a report on the state of the First Amendment. It's worth checking out:
http://www.freedomforum.org/newsstand/reports/sofa/intro.asp
Each day of this nation's life, in meetings of school boards,
library boards, city councils, state legislatures, and Congress
itself, figures of respect and renown rise on behalf of a
supportive public and proclaim, "I believe in the First
Amendment, but—" Each such announcement precedes a proposal
to regulate our speech in order to elevate our lives.
And so we have one of the more equisite ironies of a
freedom-loving society: Americans truly believe they believe in
free speech. Still, there is always that "but," that
qualification of their commitment to the rights and values
embedded in those 45 words of the First Amendment. In survey
after survey, Americans stand steadfast in support of the general
notion of free speech. In the particulars, however, we waver.
When asked to countenance the very speech the First Amendment was
drawn to protect—the speech of the radical, the rascal, even
the revolting—we become unsure. We do believe in free speech
for ourselves, but for the most part we are not so sure about
others, especially those whose words offend our taste, threaten
our children, or challenge our convictions.
Also at the conference:
http://www.freedomforum.org/first/1997/12/16sofa.asp
Keynote speaker Keen Umbehr told the audience that he lost his job,
his community and even family and friends during his First Amendment
battle with the county commission in Wabaunsee County, Kansas.
Umbehr, who had a contract to haul the county's trash, also wrote
editorials for the local newspaper, often alleging violations of law
and other misconduct by the county commission. "What I wrote was true,
and I could back it up," Umbehr said. "I believed that my
constitutional rights were live and real, waiting to be activated. I
felt that writing articles and speaking out about the government not
only was my right, it was my duty to speak the truth, regardless of
the fact that my whole livelihood was based on that county contract."
The county terminated his contract in retaliation for his articles.
Umbehr sued, and the case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
In June 1996 the court upheld Umbehr's free-speech rights.
"The troops on the front lines of the First Amendment fight
desperately need some help," Umbehr told the audience of attorneys,
scholars and experts. "You have the knowledge in here, and they need
it out there."
-Declan
Return to January 1998
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”