cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1998-09-07 - Re: What we are Fighting

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: 4d1a58f2cf69779cf9dd0f278d1006e148c1c93430240f29037aae16e224a0a8
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.980907064846.7404C-100000@well.com>
Reply To: <v03130307b218f992deb9@[209.66.100.36]>
UTC Datetime: 1998-09-07 13:56:34 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 21:56:34 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 21:56:34 +0800
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: What we are Fighting
In-Reply-To: <v03130307b218f992deb9@[209.66.100.36]>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.980907064846.7404C-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Sun, 6 Sep 1998, Tim May wrote:
> 
> There are, officially, no proposals on the table to limit speech within the
> U.S. by limiting the types and forms of language may use. There is the SAFE
> bill, which stands zero chance of passing, but this involves relaxing
> export requirements (though I expect compromises added, such as the
> felonization of crypto use in a crime, are an unwelcome step toward
> domestic restrictions).

Every version of SAFE includes crypto-in-a-crime as a key component. The
thinking of its drafters and backers like Reps. Goodlatte, Eschoo,
Lofgren, CDT, and some corporate lobbyists is that it would be too
politically controversial to pass Congress without it.

There is, offically, a proposal on the table to limit speech within the
U.S. by restricting sale, manufacture, distribution, import of non-GAK'd
crypto. A House committee approved that one year ago.

-Declan

PS: Note to DC cypherpunks. There's a meet/party 9-19 in Adams Morgan.

Thread