1997-01-07 - Re: Moderation=YES

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: cypherpunks@count04.mry.scruznet.com
Message Hash: 1630476be9460336353ab4209298aae2fc806eb3390df114e2c03a6ae4f16170
Message ID: <32D1EC42.65B2@gte.net>
Reply To: <199701061924.LAA15159@count04.mry.scruznet.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-07 06:26:54 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 22:26:54 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 22:26:54 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@count04.mry.scruznet.com
Subject: Re: Moderation=YES
In-Reply-To: <199701061924.LAA15159@count04.mry.scruznet.com>
Message-ID: <32D1EC42.65B2@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

cypherpunks@count04.mry.scruznet.com wrote:
> Please as soon as possible... make this into a moderated list...
> then I can kiss this noise goodbye...

Could you please (!) state for the record:

1. Why you can't use filters?

2. Why you want your news censored?  Do you think when (if) you pick
   up your favourite big-city newspaper, that having a "Times Staff
   Writer" edit (rewrite) all the stories is better than getting them
   straight off the wire, i.e., AP, UPI, etc.?  I'll bet you do, you
   budding little fascist.