1997-01-11 - Re: A vote of confidence for Sandy

Header Data

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
To: Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
Message Hash: 17a2d1453d312e27f58b77a941d7fccfd59403097dc8fb1397064fa3e1124e60
Message ID: <32D7DE11.2BDE@gte.net>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970109162541.11773A-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-11 18:52:24 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 10:52:24 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 10:52:24 -0800 (PST)
To: Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
Subject: Re: A vote of confidence for Sandy
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970109162541.11773A-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
Message-ID: <32D7DE11.2BDE@gte.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Rich Graves wrote:
> I'd just like to say that as disgusting as I find most of Dale's posts,
> I consider almost all of them appropriate for the list.
> While I'd classify Dale's posts as among "worst of cypherpunks,"
> IMO they are all at least *of* cypherpunks.

Rich, you have to have a mind to comment on my posts.  To call my
posts disgusting, when I as a person am  1) Vastly more concerned
about justice, truth, and openness than you, and  2) Vastly more
intelligent than you, is pure ignorance and hypocrisy.

When you have nothing to say, you do the "attack against the man",
which is a logical fallacy.  You and Sandfort can lie in bed together
on that one.  Punk.