1997-01-11 - Re: A vote of confidence for Sandy

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cf6873c2bd81d67053fb9136913f0135c8bac28c049627c95c083fdaa862ecc5
Message ID: <HyeD1D58w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <32D707A2.5410@disposable.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-11 14:42:09 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 06:42:09 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 06:42:09 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: A vote of confidence for Sandy
In-Reply-To: <32D707A2.5410@disposable.com>
Message-ID: <HyeD1D58w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

Jew-hating paranoid liar Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com> writes:
> I would not favor a moderation policy that gave carte blanche to "good guys"
> to talk about whatever they wanted ("libertarian bullshit" in Chudov's
> delicate phrasing), but required posts by "bad guys" like Dale (and in certai
> threads, me -- you never know) to be "about crypto." That's a hypocritical
> double standard.

Here's another typical post from Igor's soc.culture.russian.moderated (NOT).

Igor Chudov, a moderator of s.c.r.m, calls M. Kagalenko "envious eunich", but
Kagalenko has been banned from posting to s.c.r.m because he objected to its
creation (i.e. he's on the "blacklist" and his submissions are auto-rejected).

]From: mkagalen@lynx.dac.neu.edu (Michael Kagalenko)
]Newsgroups: soc.culture.russian,alt.genius.bill-palmer
]Subject: Re: Envious Eunuch's E-Mail Evacuations
]Message-ID: <5audbm$4vf@lynx.dac.neu.edu>
]Date: 7 Jan 1997 15:57:26 -0500
]Organization: Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 02115, USA
]Henrietta Thomas (hkt@wwa.com) wrote:
]][newsgroups trimmed]
]]ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) wrote:
]]>[crossposted to alt.genius.bill-palmer]
]]>Prof. Henrietta K. Thomas wrote:
]]Professor, eh? Well, well, well......
]]>> >That's right, Mike;  I'll give you the bad news right here in
]]>> >soc.culture.russian, since in your e-mailing, you claimed to
]]>> >speak for--NOT MICHAEL KAGALENKO, EUNUCH--but the entire
]]>> >s.c.r. readership, in trying to run me off because you were
]]>> >infuriated by a recent posting of mine.
]]>> Well, I don't know about the entire readership, but he certainly
]]>> speaks for me in this regard.
]]>Envious Eunuch Kagalenko surely does NOT speak for me and many of my
]]>acquaintainces. We support Bill's struggle against the mischievous
]]>censorous eunuch.
]]You're just angry 'cause Kagalenko tried to crash your machine.
] Correction; if I have tried to crash Chudov's computer, it would have been
] crashed. I'd venture to guess that getting root on his Linux box
] wouldn't be all that hard, either.
](Followups to sc.r.moderasted)
]Couldn't honour it, as I am permanently banned from there.
]ABILITY,n. The natural equipment to accomplish some small part of the meaner
]           ambitions distinguishing able men from dead ones.
]                -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"


Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps