1997-01-11 - Re: A vote of confidence for Sandy

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: f9f7278741a275bf040f5a19e4dc06e462763dbdc9e8c81596f3c39a6576ae8f
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.970111132128.21586B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <32D7DE11.2BDE@gte.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-11 21:28:03 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 13:28:03 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <rcgraves@disposable.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 13:28:03 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: A vote of confidence for Sandy
In-Reply-To: <32D7DE11.2BDE@gte.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.970111132128.21586B-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


For example, I think this message could have been worded in such a way that
it was on-topic. Dale really had to exert himself to make this a pure flame.
When he doesn't put so much effort into it, he's worth reading.

See also http://minerva.fileita.it/webitalia/netscum/gravesr0.html

- -rich

On Sat, 11 Jan 1997, Dale Thorn wrote:

> Rich Graves wrote:
> [snip]
> > I'd just like to say that as disgusting as I find most of Dale's posts,
> > I consider almost all of them appropriate for the list.
> > While I'd classify Dale's posts as among "worst of cypherpunks,"
> > IMO they are all at least *of* cypherpunks.
> Rich, you have to have a mind to comment on my posts.  To call my
> posts disgusting, when I as a person am  1) Vastly more concerned
> about justice, truth, and openness than you, and  2) Vastly more
> intelligent than you, is pure ignorance and hypocrisy.
> When you have nothing to say, you do the "attack against the man",
> which is a logical fallacy.  You and Sandfort can lie in bed together
> on that one.  Punk.

Version: 2.6.2