1997-06-13 - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
Message Hash: 90c4906b35e552d7fd7a4825b704475677cb04ae0db73c0d936ca2c7abfe22bd
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970613085334.27747U-100000@well.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970613110728.23715B-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-13 16:31:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:31:37 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:31:37 +0800
To: Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
Subject: Re: FUCK YOU: There's no general right to privacy -- get over it, from Netly
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970613110728.23715B-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970613085334.27747U-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Ray Arachelian wrote:
> Booooooooo!  Hisssssssssss!  Putting your bread and butter before your
> morals, eh?

Far from it. My position is a principled one, not one of convenience.

As a civil libertarian, for instance, I would not support laws that give
certain journalists more free speech "rights" than a Net-loon with a web
site.

-Declan






Thread