1997-06-13 - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly
Header Data
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
Message Hash: 90c4906b35e552d7fd7a4825b704475677cb04ae0db73c0d936ca2c7abfe22bd
Message ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970613085334.27747U-100000@well.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970613110728.23715B-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-13 16:31:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:31:37 +0800
Raw message
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:31:37 +0800
To: Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
Subject: Re: FUCK YOU: There's no general right to privacy -- get over it, from Netly
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970613110728.23715B-100000@beast.brainlink.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970613085334.27747U-100000@well.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 13 Jun 1997, Ray Arachelian wrote:
> Booooooooo! Hisssssssssss! Putting your bread and butter before your
> morals, eh?
Far from it. My position is a principled one, not one of convenience.
As a civil libertarian, for instance, I would not support laws that give
certain journalists more free speech "rights" than a Net-loon with a web
site.
-Declan
Thread
Return to June 1997
- Return to “? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>”
- Return to “Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>”
- Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
- Return to “Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>”
- Return to “dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)”
- Return to “Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>”
- Return to “Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>”
- Return to “Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>”
- Return to “Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>”
- Return to “Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>”
- Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”
- Return to “tzeruch@ceddec.com”
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”
- 1997-06-12 (Fri, 13 Jun 1997 07:11:53 +0800) - There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:42:37 +0800) - FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:42:30 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:00:49 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:23:14 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:00:49 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:56:30 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:05:09 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:19:48 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 01:21:17 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 18:25:56 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 22:44:18 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
- 1997-06-15 (Mon, 16 Jun 1997 07:49:12 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:52:54 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 01:43:59 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 18:38:33 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:19:48 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 09:32:43 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:05:09 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:31:37 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 04:03:27 +0800) - Re: Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
- 1997-06-16 (Tue, 17 Jun 1997 03:06:37 +0800) - Re: Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 04:03:27 +0800) - Re: Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 01:06:15 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it,from Netly - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 01:27:20 +0800) - Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 10:32:03 +0800) - Re: Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 11:36:00 +0800) - Re: Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 22:58:41 +0800) - Re: Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-15 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 14:15:17 +0800) - Re: Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- 1997-06-15 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 14:55:45 +0800) - Re: Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-15 (Sun, 15 Jun 1997 23:33:38 +0800) - Re: Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- 1997-06-16 (Mon, 16 Jun 1997 12:29:08 +0800) - Re: Do reporters have special rights the rest of us don’t have? - Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:42:30 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 00:29:17 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it,from Netly - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 02:42:40 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 03:03:34 +0800) - Ray Just doesn’t get it. - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 03:23:28 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 06:33:32 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - tzeruch@ceddec.com
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 22:44:56 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-23 (Tue, 24 Jun 1997 06:56:26 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-24 (Tue, 24 Jun 1997 11:27:03 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-24 (Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:07:05 +0800) - Re: William Just doesn’t get it. - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-24 (Wed, 25 Jun 1997 03:49:36 +0800) - Re: William Just doesn’t get it. - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-24 (Wed, 25 Jun 1997 06:18:14 +0800) - Re: William Just doesn’t get it. - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-27 (Fri, 27 Jun 1997 21:55:36 +0800) - Re: William Just doesn’t get it. - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
- 1997-06-24 (Wed, 25 Jun 1997 03:49:36 +0800) - Re: William Just doesn’t get it. - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-24 (Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:07:05 +0800) - Re: William Just doesn’t get it. - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-24 (Tue, 24 Jun 1997 11:27:03 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 22:12:55 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-23 (Tue, 24 Jun 1997 07:03:46 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 22:51:47 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 23:04:14 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 06:33:32 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - tzeruch@ceddec.com
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 03:23:28 +0800) - Re: Ray Just doesn’t get it. - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 03:03:34 +0800) - Ray Just doesn’t get it. - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 02:42:40 +0800) - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
- 1997-06-13 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 02:42:06 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - tzeruch@ceddec.com
- 1997-06-14 (Sat, 14 Jun 1997 08:03:58 +0800) - Re: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
- 1997-06-13 (Fri, 13 Jun 1997 23:42:37 +0800) - FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>