cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-06-14 - Re: FUCK YOU: There’s no general right to privacy – get over it, from Netly

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9998447a3a6ade89bd71feee0939dae50c9a5da67513a46019519159ea94c259
Message ID: <BZka9D126w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970613182413.612A-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
UTC Datetime: 1997-06-14 14:44:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 22:44:18 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 22:44:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FUCK YOU: There's no general right to privacy -- get over it, from Netly
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970613182413.612A-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <BZka9D126w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk> writes:

>
> > He still misunderstands my position. I'm saying you have no property right
> > in information others collect about you.
>
> There is no such thing as intellectual property rights period. All
> patents and copyrights are violations of free speech, technology is the
> only way to protect so called "intellectual property"...

I fully agree.  Technology or good marketing (you can have my software
for free, but you need to pay for "support")

> > Great. You want Congress to pass a law that says "Netscape shall release
> > no more buggy browsers." Yeah, and mandate that pi is 3.14, right?
>
> No, I wouldn`t mind one that made bugs in Micro$oft stuff criminal ;-)...
> BTW, I`m pretty sure it was pi=3.2 on that bill.

I think it was exactly 3, like it says in the Bible.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

Thread