Pat Farrell <pfarrell@netcom.com> (106 posts)
Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.
Threads
Re: The death of the list as we know it (tm)
help writing code
- 1993-10-27 (Wed, 27 Oct 93 07:10:47 PDT) - help writing code - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
- 1993-10-27 (Wed, 27 Oct 93 09:12:54 PDT) - Re: help writing code - mpjohnso@nyx.cs.du.edu (Michael Johnson)
Re: Help writing code
Re: help writing code
RE: Are we gatewayed to Usenet?
Re: Should we oppose the Data Superhighway/NII?
Washington Post story: nov 23
Checksums, etc. was Re: One Time Pads $5000|Cheap
1993-12-12 (Sun, 12 Dec 93 14:12:32 PST) - [Checksums, etc. was Re: One Time Pads $5000 | Cheap](/archive/1993/12/9a5942c64006b1fded010cb6b74e0eb24ca9e7db00a2c704f0d36a292e0ec5e2) - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com> |
RE: Inman vs. crypto
- 1993-12-17 (Fri, 17 Dec 93 07:31:18 PST) - RE: Inman vs. crypto - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
RE: Cyperwonks
- 1993-12-24 (Fri, 24 Dec 93 10:16:23 PST) - RE: Cyperwonks - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
CACM Letters
- 1993-12-28 (Tue, 28 Dec 93 14:22:34 PST) - CACM Letters - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
RE: GPS and security
- 1993-12-28 (Tue, 28 Dec 93 14:22:42 PST) - RE: GPS and security - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
RE: GPS and security
- 1993-12-29 (Wed, 29 Dec 93 15:07:52 PST) - RE: GPS and security - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
Re: Strategies for getting encryption in widespread use QUICKLY
Re: Strategies for getting encryption in widespread use QUICKLY
Re: Actively Sabotaging Clipper and Capstone?
RE: REAL WORLD ENCRYPTION
Re: Strategies for getting encryption in widespread use QUICKLY
RE: MONEY: cryptocash is transaction money
PEM, was Re: low-overhead encrypted telnet
RE: Laziness?
- 1994-03-02 (Wed, 2 Mar 94 12:51:24 PST) - RE: Laziness? - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
Windows Programming help wanted.
DC ‘punks meeting
- 1994-03-03 (Thu, 3 Mar 94 05:25:55 PST) - DC ‘punks meeting - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
Wanted Sun DIN to audio adapter
RE: The Agency Whose Name May Not Be Spoken
RE: 2nd CJ update
- 1994-03-12 (Sat, 12 Mar 94 06:52:54 PST) - RE: 2nd CJ update - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
Fw: Public Interest Summit Organizing Kit
Re: EFF Pioneer award: I nominate Phil Zimmerman…
RE: anon-mail article in LA Times
VISA’s digital cash
- 1994-04-03 (Sun, 3 Apr 94 10:27:40 PDT) - VISA’s digital cash - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
Reinventing the wheel, was Re: Proposal: some more standard remailer features
RE: MacPGP and AOL
- 1994-04-10 (Sun, 10 Apr 94 15:27:01 PDT) - RE: MacPGP and AOL - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
RE: Code review is requested.
RE: Laundering money through commodity futures
Key Eater Needed. NOT!
Chill out…. was Re: Keyserver service outRAGE
converting old keys to new MIT PGP 2.5
RE: Cryptosystems Journal
RE: DNA
- 1994-06-14 (Mon, 13 Jun 94 17:15:49 PDT) - RE: DNA - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
- 1994-06-14 (Mon, 13 Jun 94 18:47:31 PDT) - RE: DNA - Mats Bergstrom <matsb@sos.sll.se>
- 1994-06-14 (Mon, 13 Jun 94 18:56:27 PDT) - Re: DNA - sonny@netcom.com (James Hicks)
Hardware generators was: your mail
Re: Hardware generators
Hardware RN generators, data volume requirements
Re: Hardware generators was: your mail
RE: Reputation
- 1994-07-19 (Tue, 19 Jul 94 16:27:59 PDT) - RE: Reputation - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
Subject: Computer services in DTB was: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?
RE: Crime Bill FAILED to pass
Computer services NOT in DTB was: Are Remailers Liable for What They Remail?
DTB a lock RE: EFF sells out
Another Denning’s view
Snore…Re: e$: buyinfo, internet commerce, and GMU
RE: Computer Security Conference & Exibit
Re: Fast modular exponentiation
someHost@nsa.gov
- 1994-08-28 (Sun, 28 Aug 94 07:41:04 PDT) - someHost@nsa.gov - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
Re: Bad govt represents bad people?
RE: (fwd) "Will You Be a Terrorist?" ( Moi? )
MS, IBM, Apple, EFF and DTB [was : TIS, SKE, & CyberCash Inc.
Re: I Like ASCII, not MIME and Other Fancy Crap
Re: I Like ASCII, not MIME and Other Fancy Crap
Anarchists break rules, details at 11, was: The Market for Crypto–A Curmudgeon’s View
Re: “Cyherpunks Named Official Signing Authority”
RE: Tim May the Luddite–His Last Message for A While
Re: Why I have a 512 bit PGP key
RE: State of PGP dll?; Encrypted session projects
AT&T and VLSI Encryption device
RE: Fight, or Roll Over?
Re: Fight, or Roll Over?
RE: Netscape the Big Win
RE: alt.politics.org.cia
Key Escrow Workshop agenda & discussion paper 3
RE: Cyphernomicon, and a section on Escrow and Reputations
RE: Key attributes (was: pseudonyms & list health)
Acceptable NIS&T restrictions
Re: NSA says Joe Sixpack won’t buy crypto
Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
Re: Notes from NIS&T Key Escrow Export conference.
RE: Key Escrow Papers
Sigh Re: not a flame please read and think about this
DC-area Meeting Sept 16
Re: Can GAK be made “not interoperable” with PGP?
DD, pedaphiles, and Terrorists, oh my
Re: Why ecash is traceable
Re: netscape’s response
Selling our spin. was: Cypherpunks Press release
Re: Patents and trade secrets was: Encryption algorithms used in PrivaSoft
RE: Do the Right Thing
RE: Do the Right Thing
Re: Meeting notes from ANSI X.9 Meeting on Electronic Payment
NIST GAK export meeting, short version
Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
re: Secret Clearance
- 1995-12-06 (Wed, 6 Dec 95 04:54:35 PST) - re: Secret Clearance - “Pat Farrell” <pfarrell@netcom.com>
NIST GAK export meeting, Long version part 1
Re: NIST GAK export meeting, short version
GAK solutions was: Is there a lawyer in the house?
DC Cypherpunks Meeting, Dec 16. 3:00 PM
Re: NIST GAK meeting writeup, part 3 of 3
RE: ViaCrypt supports CKE in PGP
RE: crypto (semi-)export issue
DC area cypherpunks physical meeting, January 27
Re: [local] Report on Portland Cpunks meeting
Martin Marietta Energy Systems’ summary of December GAK meeting
alternative sites for NIST GAK 3 draft
DC area physical meeting, this saturday
how much entropy in common answers
Re: how much entropy in common answers