Information Security <guy@panix.com> (101 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Censorious trends: PICSRules & digsigs & anonymity, starring Feather & Templeton

• 1997-12-25 (Fri, 26 Dec 1997 02:08:36 +0800) - Censorious trends: PICSRules & digsigs & anonymity, starring Feather & Templeton - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

cypherpunks missing from Usenet

• 1997-12-27 (Sat, 27 Dec 1997 16:27:24 +0800) - cypherpunks missing from Usenet - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1997-12-28 (Sun, 28 Dec 1997 08:22:46 +0800) - Re: cypherpunks missing from Usenet - “Robert A. Costner” <pooh@efga.org>

Re: cypherpunks missing from Usenet

• 1997-12-28 (Sun, 28 Dec 1997 09:05:40 +0800) - Re: cypherpunks missing from Usenet - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: cypherpunks missing from Usenet

• 1997-12-28 (Sun, 28 Dec 1997 10:18:07 +0800) - Re: cypherpunks missing from Usenet - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1997-12-28 (Sun, 28 Dec 1997 16:25:10 +0800) - Re: cypherpunks missing from Usenet - Julian Assange <proff@iq.org>

Vulis again

• 1997-12-29 (Mon, 29 Dec 1997 23:14:51 +0800) - Vulis again - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Vulis again

• 1997-12-31 (Wed, 31 Dec 1997 00:35:58 -0800 (PST)) - Vulis again - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Internet Watch Foundation reports child nudity as illegal!!

• 1998-01-05 (Tue, 6 Jan 1998 00:53:42 +0800) - Re: Internet Watch Foundation reports child nudity as illegal!! - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: [Humor] Kennedy’s New Legislation

• 1998-01-06 (Tue, 6 Jan 1998 09:58:49 +0800) - Re: [Humor] Kennedy’s New Legislation - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: cypherpunks and guns

• 1998-01-06 (Wed, 7 Jan 1998 03:19:53 +0800) - Re: cypherpunks and guns - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-01-07 (Wed, 7 Jan 1998 14:44:17 +0800) - Re: cypherpunks and guns - “snow” <snow@smoke.suba.com>

Re: Sentencing for Electronic Copyright Infringement

• 1998-01-08 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 08:23:11 +0800) - Re: Sentencing for Electronic Copyright Infringement - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: The Digital Society Group

• 1998-01-08 (Thu, 8 Jan 1998 10:11:51 +0800) - Re: The Digital Society Group - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Vulis again

• 1998-01-08 (Fri, 9 Jan 1998 05:04:02 +0800) - Vulis again - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: The Digital Society Group

• 1998-01-08 (Fri, 9 Jan 1998 05:16:03 +0800) - Re: The Digital Society Group - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-01-08 (Fri, 9 Jan 1998 07:32:13 +0800) - Re: The Digital Society Group - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>

Re: Schneier’s metrocard cracked

• 1998-01-09 (Fri, 9 Jan 1998 13:02:03 +0800) - Re: Schneier’s metrocard cracked - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Dimitry Vulis need attention again

• 1998-01-11 (Mon, 12 Jan 1998 03:57:26 +0800) - Dimitry Vulis need attention again - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Schneier’s metrocard cracked

• 1998-01-13 (Wed, 14 Jan 1998 03:53:42 +0800) - Re: Schneier’s metrocard cracked - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Chris Lewis’s death?

• 1998-01-15 (Fri, 16 Jan 1998 07:59:22 +0800) - Re: Chris Lewis’s death? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-01-30 (Fri, 30 Jan 1998 09:15:08 +0800) - Re: Chris Lewis’s death? - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
  • 1998-01-30 (Sat, 31 Jan 1998 05:15:39 +0800) - Re: Chris Lewis’s death? - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)

Re: Latest smartcard software

• 1998-01-21 (Wed, 21 Jan 1998 18:26:21 +0800) - Re: Latest smartcard software - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-01-22 (Thu, 22 Jan 1998 08:58:29 +0800) - Re: Latest smartcard software - Marshall Clow <mclow@owl.csusm.edu>

Re: Chris Lewis’s death?

• 1998-01-30 (Fri, 30 Jan 1998 20:24:05 +0800) - Re: Chris Lewis’s death? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: tell me what you think of this RC2 C++ source code

• 1998-01-30 (Fri, 30 Jan 1998 20:33:55 +0800) - Re: tell me what you think of this RC2 C++ source code - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

SmartCards in the news

• 1998-02-02 (Tue, 3 Feb 1998 01:25:00 +0800) - SmartCards in the news - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Bush Gang Suspected In Assault On Presidency

• 1998-02-03 (Tue, 3 Feb 1998 11:57:49 +0800) - Re: Bush Gang Suspected In Assault On Presidency - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Whoa: British SmartCard rollout

• 1998-02-04 (Wed, 4 Feb 1998 11:30:44 +0800) - Whoa: British SmartCard rollout - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-05 (Thu, 5 Feb 1998 08:19:33 +0800) - Fingerprinting in CA [was Whoa: British SmartCard rollout] - “Attila T. Hun” <attila@hun.org>
    • 1998-02-05 (Fri, 6 Feb 1998 00:46:43 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting in CA - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
    • 1998-02-07 (Sat, 7 Feb 1998 09:30:58 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting in CA [was Whoa: British SmartCard rollout] - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1998-02-08 (Sun, 8 Feb 1998 13:28:59 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting in CA - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-07 (Sat, 7 Feb 1998 08:27:28 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting in CA [was Whoa: British SmartCard rollout] - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>

Rogue EFF Dir Brad Templeton

• 1998-02-04 (Thu, 5 Feb 1998 02:33:23 +0800) - Rogue EFF Dir Brad Templeton - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Fingerprinting in CA [was Whoa: British SmartCard rollout]

• 1998-02-05 (Thu, 5 Feb 1998 10:36:03 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting in CA [was Whoa: British SmartCard rollout] - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Changing to Moderated Cypherpunks – How?

• 1998-02-05 (Thu, 5 Feb 1998 13:20:11 +0800) - Re: Changing to Moderated Cypherpunks – How? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-05 (Thu, 5 Feb 1998 21:21:15 +0800) - Re: Changing to Moderated Cypherpunks – How? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1998-02-06 (Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:17:46 +0800) - Re: Changing to Moderated Cypherpunks – How? - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: Changing to Moderated Cypherpunks – How?

• 1998-02-06 (Fri, 6 Feb 1998 22:53:34 +0800) - Re: Changing to Moderated Cypherpunks – How? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: FW: SEC Rule Announcement

• 1998-02-06 (Sat, 7 Feb 1998 04:24:39 +0800) - Re: FW: SEC Rule Announcement - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Fingerprinting in CA [was Whoa: British SmartCard rollout]

• 1998-02-07 (Sat, 7 Feb 1998 08:21:03 +0800) - Re: Fingerprinting in CA [was Whoa: British SmartCard rollout] - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Most elegant wording against privacy/law-enforcement “balance”

• 1998-02-07 (Sat, 7 Feb 1998 09:34:11 +0800) - Most elegant wording against privacy/law-enforcement “balance” - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-07 (Sat, 7 Feb 1998 10:25:02 +0800) - Re: Most elegant wording against privacy/law-enforcement “balance” - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>

Re: BBN

• 1998-02-08 (Sun, 8 Feb 1998 11:39:36 +0800) - Re: BBN - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Guy Polis is a pedophile

• 1998-02-08 (Mon, 9 Feb 1998 05:02:10 +0800) - Re: Guy Polis is a pedophile - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Vulis is asking for it

• 1998-02-10 (Tue, 10 Feb 1998 15:37:37 +0800) - Vulis is asking for it - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Cyber ‘Nannys”

• 1998-02-11 (Wed, 11 Feb 1998 09:56:59 +0800) - Re: Cyber ‘Nannys” - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

www.lanl.gov

• 1998-02-12 (Wed, 11 Feb 1998 18:33:43 -0800 (PST)) - www.lanl.gov - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-12 (Wed, 11 Feb 1998 20:05:19 -0800 (PST)) - Re: www.lanl.gov - Mark Hedges <hedges@infonex.com>
  • 1998-02-12 (Wed, 11 Feb 1998 20:38:32 -0800 (PST)) - Specious use of specie? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1998-02-12 (Wed, 11 Feb 1998 20:44:39 -0800 (PST)) - Re: www.lanl.gov - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>

Re: Me & Louis Freeh

• 1998-02-12 (Wed, 11 Feb 1998 18:56:48 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Me & Louis Freeh - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-12 (Wed, 11 Feb 1998 20:08:27 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Me & Louis Freeh - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1998-02-12 (Thu, 12 Feb 1998 05:23:52 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Me & Louis Freeh - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)

Re: www.lanl.gov

• 1998-02-12 (Wed, 11 Feb 1998 20:12:38 -0800 (PST)) - Re: www.lanl.gov - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-12 (Wed, 11 Feb 1998 20:56:18 -0800 (PST)) - Re: www.lanl.gov - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Dr. Dimento again

• 1998-02-12 (Thu, 12 Feb 1998 05:46:49 -0800 (PST)) - Dr. Dimento again - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Me & Louis Freeh

• 1998-02-12 (Thu, 12 Feb 1998 05:54:55 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Me & Louis Freeh - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Sabotaging Australian Involvement in Bill’s War

• 1998-02-13 (Thu, 12 Feb 1998 19:54:53 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Sabotaging Australian Involvement in Bill’s War - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Regulators back down on SEC/NASD email snooping rules

• 1998-02-13 (Thu, 12 Feb 1998 20:19:27 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Regulators back down on SEC/NASD email snooping rules - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

The Doctor has been spanked!!!

• 1998-02-13 (Fri, 13 Feb 1998 14:01:48 -0800 (PST)) - The Doctor has been spanked!!! - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Cypherpunk Policeman?

• 1998-02-14 (Sat, 14 Feb 1998 03:26:53 -0800 (PST)) - Cypherpunk Policeman? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Consumer Biometric Privacy Protection Act of 1998

• 1998-02-15 (Sat, 14 Feb 1998 23:56:06 -0800 (PST)) - Consumer Biometric Privacy Protection Act of 1998 - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Is spam really a problem?

• 1998-02-18 (Thu, 19 Feb 1998 05:21:10 +0800) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-21 (Sat, 21 Feb 1998 08:53:56 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Is spam really a problem? - sunder <sunder@brainlink.com>

Re: Five industry giants propose encryption plan to protect Hollywood

• 1998-02-20 (Sat, 21 Feb 1998 06:11:38 +0800) - Re: Five industry giants propose encryption plan to protect Hollywood - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-21 (Sat, 21 Feb 1998 08:38:36 +0800) - Re: Five industry giants propose encryption plan to protect Hollywood - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1998-02-24 (Mon, 23 Feb 1998 16:24:09 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Five industry giants propose encryption plan to protect Hollywood - sunder <sunder@brainlink.com>
      • 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 03:04:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Five industry giants propose encryption plan to protect Hollywood - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>

PK & Re: Is spam really a problem?

• 1998-02-20 (Sat, 21 Feb 1998 06:16:47 +0800) - PK & Re: Is spam really a problem? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-24 (Mon, 23 Feb 1998 16:49:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PK & Re: Is spam really a problem? - sunder <sunder@brainlink.com>

Re: Fwd: Big Brother Sees through walls (from the spyking list)

• 1998-02-20 (Sat, 21 Feb 1998 07:16:50 +0800) - Re: Fwd: Big Brother Sees through walls (from the spyking list) - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-21 (Sat, 21 Feb 1998 04:45:29 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fwd: Big Brother Sees through walls (from the spyking list) - Ken Williams <jkwilli2@unity.ncsu.edu>
    • 1998-02-21 (Sat, 21 Feb 1998 10:59:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fwd: Big Brother Sees through walls (from the spyking list) - fnorky@geocities.com (Douglas L. Peterson)

Re: In todays CyberTimes–“European Study Paints a Chilling Portrai

• 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 07:00:49 -0800 (PST)) - Re: In todays CyberTimes–“European Study Paints a Chilling Portrai - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 07:27:09 -0800 (PST)) - Re: In todays CyberTimes–“European Study Paints a Chilling Portrai - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>

Fight ECHELON while the topic is hot!

• 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 07:43:55 -0800 (PST)) - Fight ECHELON while the topic is hot! - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 08:15:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fight ECHELON while the topic is hot! - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 12:20:41 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fight ECHELON while the topic is hot! - Julian Assange <proff@iq.org>

Re: Fight ECHELON while the topic is hot!

• 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 08:22:21 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Fight ECHELON while the topic is hot! - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?

• 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 08:24:30 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Cypherpunk Policeman? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Pentagon Papers

• 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 08:58:46 -0800 (PST)) - Pentagon Papers - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?

• 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 12:16:46 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Cypherpunk Policeman? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?

• 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:29:28 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Cypherpunk Policeman? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-24 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 15:55:51 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Cypherpunk Policeman? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?

• 1998-02-25 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 22:30:56 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Cypherpunk Policeman? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-25 (Wed, 25 Feb 1998 01:19:14 -0800 (PST)) - ascii art is not a digital signature (Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Re: Group to Attack Clinton on Crypto

• 1998-02-25 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 22:35:09 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Group to Attack Clinton on Crypto - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-25 (Wed, 25 Feb 1998 08:26:08 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Group to Attack Clinton on Crypto - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

Killing the Unabomber

• 1998-02-25 (Tue, 24 Feb 1998 22:42:52 -0800 (PST)) - Killing the Unabomber - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-02-27 (Fri, 27 Feb 1998 14:20:41 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Killing the Unabomber - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>

Re: ascii art is not a digital signature (Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?)

• 1998-02-25 (Wed, 25 Feb 1998 02:40:48 -0800 (PST)) - Re: ascii art is not a digital signature (Re: Cypherpunk Policeman?) - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Canadian Crypto GAK [slashdot.org]

• 1998-05-01 (Fri, 1 May 1998 13:09:24 +0800) - Re: Canadian Crypto GAK [slashdot.org] - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

NSA & y2k

• 1998-05-19 (Tue, 19 May 1998 08:42:59 -0700 (PDT)) - NSA & y2k - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Thoughtcrime

• 1998-09-06 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 04:10:07 +0800) - Re: Thoughtcrime - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: 090498_crypto

• 1998-09-06 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 04:15:17 +0800) - [Re: 090498crypto](/archive/1998/09/854d51ba0f0f2c81e4453eff8156f84ff45031f8a917690e06eab905a5c0d919) - _Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 10:15:27 +0800) - [Re: 090498crypto](/archive/1998/09/b120d6b404bdbb9e1f98a246ea5957d868b53d56bcdb0287ae1c3aeea888dbdf) - _Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
    • 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 20:27:49 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
  • 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 11:06:10 +0800) - What we are Fighting - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 21:56:34 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1998-09-07 (Tue, 8 Sep 1998 00:31:30 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
        • 1998-09-07 (Tue, 8 Sep 1998 05:59:32 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 23:47:28 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
      • 1998-09-07 (Tue, 8 Sep 1998 01:48:09 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
      • 1998-09-07 (Tue, 8 Sep 1998 05:57:50 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 23:54:31 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1998-09-07 (Tue, 8 Sep 1998 05:43:48 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
        • 1998-09-08 (Tue, 8 Sep 1998 10:25:39 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1998-09-08 (Tue, 8 Sep 1998 15:58:32 +0800) - RE: What we are Fighting - “James Lucier” <james.lucier@worldnet.att.net>

Re: What we are Fighting

• 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 20:05:17 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 20:55:29 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>

Re: [Fwd: ISAKMP Key Recovery Extensions]

• 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 20:22:38 +0800) - Re: [Fwd: ISAKMP Key Recovery Extensions] - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

KRAP is at it in the IETF

• 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 20:55:55 +0800) - KRAP is at it in the IETF - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: What we are Fighting

• 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 21:47:53 +0800) - Re: What we are Fighting - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: KRAP is at it in the IETF

• 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 21:53:29 +0800) - Re: KRAP is at it in the IETF - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: any relation?

• 1998-09-07 (Mon, 7 Sep 1998 22:00:12 +0800) - Re: any relation? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Carl Johnson Warrant and Complaint

• 1998-09-09 (Wed, 9 Sep 1998 13:11:57 +0800) - Re: Carl Johnson Warrant and Complaint - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Cypherpunks as a Continuing Criminal Enterprise?

• 1998-09-09 (Wed, 9 Sep 1998 16:09:56 +0800) - Re: Cypherpunks as a Continuing Criminal Enterprise? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Carl Johnson Warrant and Complaint

• 1998-09-09 (Wed, 9 Sep 1998 16:21:30 +0800) - Re: Carl Johnson Warrant and Complaint - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: oil, greens, recycling, and poly-ticks.

• 1998-09-10 (Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:47:01 +0800) - Re: oil, greens, recycling, and poly-ticks. - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-09-10 (Thu, 10 Sep 1998 15:39:36 +0800) - Re: oil, greens, recycling, and poly-ticks. - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>

RE: A Cypherpunk Trial, Yes

• 1998-09-11 (Fri, 11 Sep 1998 10:51:21 +0800) - RE: A Cypherpunk Trial, Yes - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: a few facts on Presidential peccadillos (fwd)

• 1998-09-14 (Mon, 14 Sep 1998 20:17:32 +0800) - Re: a few facts on Presidential peccadillos (fwd) - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Predictions: Crime and Criminal Justice in the 21st Century

• 1998-09-14 (Mon, 14 Sep 1998 20:52:58 +0800) - Re: Predictions: Crime and Criminal Justice in the 21st Century - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: US Updates Crypto Policy

• 1998-09-16 (Wed, 16 Sep 1998 11:41:07 +0800) - Re: US Updates Crypto Policy - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

This is a listed crime?

• 1998-09-20 (Mon, 21 Sep 1998 03:16:36 +0800) - This is a listed crime? - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-09-21 (Mon, 21 Sep 1998 09:22:29 +0800) - Re: This is a listed crime? - attila <attila@hun.org>
    • 1998-09-21 (Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:23:45 +0800) - Re: This is a listed crime? - Michael Motyka <mmotyka@lsil.com>
    • 1998-09-22 (Wed, 23 Sep 1998 01:23:44 +0800) - Re: This is a listed crime? - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
      • 1998-09-22 (Wed, 23 Sep 1998 02:07:46 +0800) - Re: This is a listed crime? - attila <attila@hun.org>
      • 1998-09-23 (Wed, 23 Sep 1998 14:21:18 +0800) - Re: This is a listed crime? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1998-09-21 (Mon, 21 Sep 1998 12:05:07 +0800) - Re: This is a listed crime? - Michael Motyka <mmotyka@lsil.com>
  • 1998-09-21 (Mon, 21 Sep 1998 13:33:30 +0800) - Re: This is a listed crime? - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>

Re: Meriweather v. Gates

• 1998-09-29 (Tue, 29 Sep 1998 10:29:46 +0800) - Re: Meriweather v. Gates - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Garment industry…..

• 1998-10-06 (Tue, 6 Oct 1998 08:51:39 +0800) - Re: Garment industry….. - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Web TV with 128b exported

• 1998-10-06 (Tue, 6 Oct 1998 11:25:29 +0800) - Re: Web TV with 128b exported - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-10-06 (Tue, 6 Oct 1998 13:04:13 +0800) - Re: Web TV with 128b exported - James Glave <james@wired.com>

Re: Web TV with 128b exported

• 1998-10-08 (Fri, 9 Oct 1998 02:17:29 +0800) - Re: Web TV with 128b exported - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: does Web TV use forward secret cipher-suites? (Re: Web TV with 128b exported)

• 1998-10-08 (Fri, 9 Oct 1998 05:57:14 +0800) - Re: does Web TV use forward secret cipher-suites? (Re: Web TV with 128b exported) - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: EZ Wiretap Server

• 1998-10-10 (Sat, 10 Oct 1998 12:37:19 +0800) - Re: EZ Wiretap Server - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Hidden WebTV signatures

• 1998-10-11 (Mon, 12 Oct 1998 01:12:25 +0800) - Re: Hidden WebTV signatures - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: IRS wants cypherpunks archives

• 1998-10-14 (Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:11:49 +0800) - Re: IRS wants cypherpunks archives - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Aaron Debunks Crypto Myths

• 1998-10-14 (Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:38:28 +0800) - Re: Aaron Debunks Crypto Myths - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Gary Burnore vs. Earth (Was: Value of Annon. Remailers)

• 1998-10-14 (Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:57:14 +0800) - Re: Gary Burnore vs. Earth (Was: Value of Annon. Remailers) - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Gary Burnore vs. Earth (Was: Value of Annon. Remailers)

• 1998-10-14 (Thu, 15 Oct 1998 06:13:55 +0800) - Re: Gary Burnore vs. Earth (Was: Value of Annon. Remailers) - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

“Annihilating less-than-useful contributors”

• 1998-10-17 (Sat, 17 Oct 1998 09:08:19 +0800) - “Annihilating less-than-useful contributors” - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Regarding Mitnick: not.

• 1998-10-25 (Mon, 26 Oct 1998 07:02:51 +0800) - Regarding Mitnick: not. - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Jim Gilmore

• 1998-10-30 (Fri, 30 Oct 1998 13:03:00 +0800) - Jim Gilmore - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

William H. Gates III

• 1998-10-30 (Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:09:33 +0800) - William H. Gates III - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
  • 1998-10-30 (Fri, 30 Oct 1998 14:56:19 +0800) - Re: William H. Gates III - “Robert A. Costner” <pooh@efga.org>
  • 1998-10-30 (Sat, 31 Oct 1998 00:49:18 +0800) - Re: William H. Gates III - Matt Elliott <melliott@ncsa.uiuc.edu>

“Practical Joke”

• 1998-11-05 (Thu, 5 Nov 1998 16:37:30 +0800) - “Practical Joke” - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: A question about the new ISP ruling and email…

• 1998-11-07 (Sun, 8 Nov 1998 04:16:17 +0800) - Re: A question about the new ISP ruling and email… - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Advertising Creepiness

• 1998-11-08 (Mon, 9 Nov 1998 05:23:37 +0800) - Re: Advertising Creepiness - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: Advertising Creepiness

• Unknown thread root
  • 1998-11-09 (Mon, 9 Nov 1998 23:54:22 +0800) - Re: Advertising Creepiness - Information Security <guy@panix.com>
    • 1998-11-10 (Tue, 10 Nov 1998 08:31:38 +0800) - Guy, anti-copyright hacker (Re: Advertising Creepiness) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Re: Guy, anti-copyright hacker (Re: Advertising Creepiness)

• 1998-11-10 (Tue, 10 Nov 1998 23:53:58 +0800) - Re: Guy, anti-copyright hacker (Re: Advertising Creepiness) - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: fuck copyright (Re: Advertising Creepiness) (fwd)

• 1998-11-11 (Wed, 11 Nov 1998 08:44:02 +0800) - Re: fuck copyright (Re: Advertising Creepiness) (fwd) - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

vznuri

• 1998-11-17 (Tue, 17 Nov 1998 11:45:51 +0800) - vznuri - Information Security <guy@panix.com>

Re: SIGH… NOT!! THC tainted oranges

• 1998-11-30 (Mon, 30 Nov 1998 12:03:59 +0800) - Re: SIGH… NOT!! THC tainted oranges - Information Security <guy@panix.com>