1997-01-09 - Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: sandfort@crl.com (Sandy Sandfort)
Message Hash: 7002af7e454974db0c413cec92774b5583deec144eab3f75401de41229d49208
Message ID: <199701090122.TAA27883@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970108130901.28929H-100000@crl.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-09 01:28:05 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 17:28:05 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 17:28:05 -0800 (PST)
To: sandfort@crl.com (Sandy Sandfort)
Subject: Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks "moderation" experiment in Jan
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970108130901.28929H-100000@crl.crl.com>
Message-ID: <199701090122.TAA27883@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 1997, Black Unicorn wrote:
> > What is the threshold which, for example, constitutes an "insult" ?
> > 
> > "Louis Freeh couldn't identify a directed well managed crypto policy if it
> > bit him on his pimple speckled ass."
> 
> Truth (and relevance) are a defense.  :-)

If your approval is your certification of truthfulness of articles,
you might be held liable for libel. Is that correct?

	- Igor.





Thread