cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-01-09 - Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan

Header Data

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: devnull@www.video-collage.com
Message Hash: 7fb57007fdda074690dc5434bce5d7d1fe1fddd05609f9c7510200573f0356e4
Message ID: <199701090118.TAA27824@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.970108165707.25470B-100000@polaris>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-09 01:24:32 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 17:24:32 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 17:24:32 -0800 (PST)
To: devnull@www.video-collage.com
Subject: Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks "moderation" experiment in Jan
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.94.970108165707.25470B-100000@polaris>
Message-ID: <199701090118.TAA27824@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Black Unicorn wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
> 
> > C'punks,
> > 
> > On Sun, 5 Jan 1997, Black Unicorn wrote:
> > 
> > > How will borderline posts be dealt with?  Posts that contain a great deal
> > > of content and thoughful discussion and still manage to contain flames?
> > > 
> > > Will flames be an automatic boot for a post (zero tolerance), or will they
> > > be balanced against post content?
> > 
> > Zero tolerance will be my first approximation.  I may modify 
> > that as I see how things really work out.  So far, though, I
> > don't recall see any of those "high content with flames" animals.
> > Most posts are one or the other.
> 
> Haven't you been reading my stuff?
> 

Indeed, I suggest a zero tolerance policy for posts of Prof. Black 
Unicorn where content is mixed with flames.

	- Igor.

Thread