From: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>
To: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
Message Hash: 405092aa8300c7ebce063a47d5e440a60120d0d68203057e69779cbd2fb8d14d
Message ID: <ocrlo34ozgm.fsf@ml.com>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970718124449.26795G-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-18 21:39:39 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 05:39:39 +0800
From: Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 05:39:39 +0800
To: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Keepers of the keys
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970718124449.26795G-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <ocrlo34ozgm.fsf@ml.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Joe Shea (via Declan McCullagh) writes:
> Declan, what would you think if the actual keepers of the keys,
> so to speak, were the courts, such as the Administratoive Office of the
> US Courts? That would at least seem to reduce a lot of the possible
> privacy concerns. One has the sense that once they get into the hands of
> the varius agencies, they'll get back out.
Why do I feel like we are going around and around in circles?
How about we give copies of our house-keys to the courts? We should
also send them our old backup tapes, just in case they need them, too.
--
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
Return to September 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”