1997-07-18 - Re: Keepers of the keys

Header Data

From: Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
To: Lizard <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: acb2ae965fa6a987a91266fa437c7c00f64e07b8211bba4541758767314c945f
Message ID: <v03102818aff599461e84@[10.0.2.15]>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970718124449.26795G-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-07-18 22:55:38 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:55:38 +0800

Raw message

From: Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:55:38 +0800
To: Lizard <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Keepers of the keys
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970718124449.26795G-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <v03102818aff599461e84@[10.0.2.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 1:36 PM -0700 7/18/97, Lizard wrote:>Frankly, I find it mildly
>amusing no one has asked the Congressional defenders of key escrow, point
>blank, "What safeguards do you have against keys falling into the hands of
>the next Ames?" Who watches the watchmen?

Why not go one step further and get the strong crypto supporters in the
Senate to tack on an ammendment to the McCain-Kerrey-bill forcing the FBI
and our most secret security agencies to use the very same
government/industry escrow entitites (but not any of the intelligence
organizations themselves) for all their encrypted data storage and
communications traffic and requiring regular GOA compliance reviews.

--Steve








Thread