Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com> (43 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

.sig followup

• 1996-04-05 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 12:51:04 +0800) - .sig followup - frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
  • 1996-04-05 (Fri, 5 Apr 1996 17:00:37 +0800) - Re: .sig followup - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
    • 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 14:30:28 +0800) - Re: .sig followup - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

myths of software “standards” (long)

• 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 15:49:40 +0800) - myths of software “standards” (long) - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
  • 1996-04-06 (Sat, 6 Apr 1996 22:30:57 +0800) - Re: myths of software “standards” - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
    • 1996-04-07 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 16:19:07 +0800) - Re: myths of software “standards” - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
      • 1996-04-07 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 17:23:27 +0800) - Re: myths of software “standards” - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Someone’s screwing around with anon.penet.fi

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-04-07 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 08:06:56 +0800) - Someone’s screwing around with anon.penet.fi - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
    • 1996-04-07 (Sun, 7 Apr 1996 13:24:27 +0800) - Re: Someone’s screwing around with anon.penet.fi - Magnus Y Alvestad <magnus@ii.uib.no>

Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase

• 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 09:34:10 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - rngaugp@alpha.c2.org
  • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 18:19:59 +0800) - Re: “Contempt” charges likely to increase - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Bank transactions on Internet

• 1996-04-08 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 07:17:01 +0800) - Bank transactions on Internet - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@digit.ee>
  • 1996-04-08 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 07:49:15 +0800) - Re: Bank transactions on Internet - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 08:39:42 +0800) - Re: Bank transactions on Internet - sameer@c2.org
      • 1996-04-09 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 04:18:09 +0800) - Re: Bank transactions on Internet - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@digit.ee>
  • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 11:09:46 +0800) - Re: Bank transactions on Internet - “JR Weaver” <weaver@harry.bwi.wec.com>
    • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 13:18:49 +0800) - Re: Bank transactions on Internet - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1996-04-09 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 04:34:44 +0800) - Re: Bank transactions on Internet - =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCri_Kaljundi?= <jk@digit.ee>
        • 1996-04-09 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 06:58:54 +0800) - Re: Bank transactions on Internet - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 14:49:27 +0800) - Re: Bank transactions on Internet - Eric Young <eay@mincom.oz.au>
    • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 20:05:56 +0800) - Re: Bank transactions on Internet - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work

• 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 08:33:11 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work - David Loysen <dwl@hnc.com>
  • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 12:44:58 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
  • 1996-04-09 (Tue, 9 Apr 1996 22:03:36 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Scientologists may subpoena anonymous remailer records

• 1996-04-10 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 18:39:47 +0800) - Scientologists may subpoena anonymous remailer records - John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
  • 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:02:33 +0800) - Re: Scientologists may subpoena anonymous remailer records - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
    • 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 04:18:54 +0800) - Re: Scientologists may subpoena anonymous remailer records - Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
  • 1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 06:55:27 +0800) - Re: Scientologists may subpoena anonymous remailer records - sameer@c2.org
  • 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 11:05:04 +0800) - Re: Scientologists may subpoena anonymous remailer records - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>

Re: Message not deliverable

• 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 13:23:28 +0800) - Re: Message not deliverable - JonWienke@aol.com
  • 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 02:32:16 +0800) - Re: Message not deliverable - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 18:43:30 +0800) - Re: Message not deliverable - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
    • 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 21:26:32 +0800) - Re: Message not deliverable - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>

Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project

• 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 13:03:07 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 14:07:54 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
  • 1996-04-12 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 23:30:39 +0800) - Re: Know Your Net.Enemies Project - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

RE: questions about bits and bytes

• 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 05:51:52 +0800) - RE: questions about bits and bytes - Blake Coverett <blake@bcdev.com>
  • 1996-04-12 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 06:33:54 +0800) - RE: bits and bytes / CDA perverting net protocol - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun

• 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 14:51:04 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
  • 1996-04-11 (Thu, 11 Apr 1996 21:57:10 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - “Christopher J. Shaulis” <cjs@netcom.com>
    • 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 05:33:56 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
  • 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 03:46:39 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1996-04-12 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 01:04:49 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
    • 1996-04-11 (Fri, 12 Apr 1996 07:58:35 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
      • 1996-04-12 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 05:55:45 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
  • 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 23:22:12 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Marshall Clow <mclow@owl.csusm.edu>
    • 1996-04-13 (Sat, 13 Apr 1996 21:31:28 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
    • 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 08:27:53 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
      • 1996-04-17 (Wed, 17 Apr 1996 10:22:24 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
        • 1996-04-17 (Wed, 17 Apr 1996 15:07:47 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
        • 1996-04-17 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 03:40:14 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Jeff Barber <jeffb@sware.com>
          • 1996-04-18 (Thu, 18 Apr 1996 09:54:59 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
            • 1996-04-19 (Sat, 20 Apr 1996 04:36:02 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
              • 1996-04-20 (Sat, 20 Apr 1996 15:50:17 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
    • 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 16:30:49 +0800) - Re: Protocols at the Point of a Gun - Sten Drescher <stend@grendel.texas.net>
      • 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 20:18:44 +0800) - Digital Ignorance (was Re: Protocols at the point of a gun) - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: unsubscrive

• 1996-04-09 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 06:52:15 +0800) - Re: unsubscrive - “Brad Shantz” <bshantz@nwlink.com>
  • 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 09:31:43 +0800) - Re: unsubscrive - Let’s make a special list for these people! - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
    • 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:36:40 +0800) - [NOISE] Re: unsubscrive - Let’s make a special list for these people! - Alan Barrett <apb@iafrica.com>
  • 1996-04-14 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 10:29:24 +0800) - Re: unsubscrive - Let’s make a special list for these people! - Dave Del Torto <ddt@lsd.com>

key bit lengths

• 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 05:07:35 +0800) - key bit lengths - Jack Mott <thecrow@iconn.net>
  • 1996-04-14 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 06:36:40 +0800) - Re: key bit lengths - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
    • 1996-04-15 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 08:35:32 +0800) - Re: key bit lengths - Julian Assange <proff@suburbia.net>
  • 1996-04-15 (Mon, 15 Apr 1996 14:44:51 +0800) - Re: key bit lengths - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

RSA & Sec. Dyn.

• 1996-04-15 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 05:00:10 +0800) - RSA & Sec. Dyn. - Ben Rothke <ben.rothke@citicorp.com>
  • 1996-04-16 (Tue, 16 Apr 1996 13:05:39 +0800) - Re: RSA & Sec. Dyn. - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

RE: math patents

• 1996-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 09:15:25 +0800) - RE: math patents - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1996-04-19 (Fri, 19 Apr 1996 17:39:02 +0800) - Legality of Crypto in Canada? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Bernstein ruling meets the virus law

• 1996-04-20 (Sat, 20 Apr 1996 14:06:10 +0800) - Bernstein ruling meets the virus law - tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
  • 1996-04-20 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 01:13:29 +0800) - Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law - Bruce Marshall <brucem@wichita.fn.net>
    • 1996-04-20 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 06:33:51 +0800) - Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
      • 1996-04-22 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 01:55:56 +0800) - Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law - Bruce Marshall <brucem@wichita.fn.net>
        • 1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 08:16:23 +0800) - Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law - Mark Aldrich <maldrich@grctechs.va.grci.com>
          • 1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 09:34:08 +0800) - Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law - Bruce Marshall <brucem@wichita.fn.net>
            • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 12:37:57 +0800) - Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
              • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 12:54:43 +0800) - Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
                • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:41:57 -0700 (PDT)) - [NOISE] Reasonable people - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
                  • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:34:19 -0700 (PDT)) - [NOISE- Legal Theory] Reasonable people - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
                    • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 15:43:40 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [NOISE- Legal Theory] Reasonable people - Scott Brickner <sjb@universe.digex.net>
                      • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 16:23:09 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: [NOISE- Legal Theory] Reasonable people - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
        • 1996-04-23 (Tue, 23 Apr 1996 10:03:22 +0800) - Re: Bernstein ruling meets the virus law - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: 5th protect password?

• 1996-04-20 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 06:44:00 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 13:51:24 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - Jonathon Blake <grafolog@netcom.com>
  • 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 16:00:30 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: spinner entropy

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 12:25:32 +0800) - Re: spinner entropy - Jack Mott <thecrow@iconn.net>
    • 1996-04-21 (Sun, 21 Apr 1996 17:48:10 +0800) - Hardware RNG (was Re: spinner entropy) - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: 5th protect password?

• 1996-04-21 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 05:11:44 +0800) - Re: 5th protect password? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-04-22 (Mon, 22 Apr 1996 09:17:36 +0800) - [getting noisy] Re: 5th protect password? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: Golden Key Campaign

• 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 16:40:03 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 18:52:33 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
  • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 20:40:13 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
  • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:47:16 +0800) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>
    • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 08:41:13 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - sameer@c2.org
      • 1996-04-24 (Wed, 24 Apr 1996 14:38:32 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Golden Key Campaign - Jeff Weinstein <jsw@netscape.com>

CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture?

• 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 12:24:26 +0800) - CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - mkj@october.segno.com
  • 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 13:08:07 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
  • 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 13:42:09 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
    • 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 16:04:15 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
  • 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 15:00:51 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-04-28 (Sun, 28 Apr 1996 18:07:41 +0800) - Re: CryptoAnarchy: What’s wrong with this picture? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

PGP and pseudonyms

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:00:24 +0800) - PGP and pseudonyms - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

code vs cypher

• 1996-04-27 (Sat, 27 Apr 1996 17:14:01 +0800) - code vs cypher - hochiminh@alpha.c2.org
  • 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:08:33 +0800) - Re: code vs cypher - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: PGP and pseudonyms

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 16:16:12 +0800) - Re: PGP and pseudonyms - Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
  • 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 15:06:24 +0800) - Re: PGP and pseudonyms - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
    • 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 15:59:36 +0800) - Re: PGP and pseudonyms - Rich Graves <llurch@networking.stanford.edu>
      • 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 22:34:42 +0800) - Re: PGP and pseudonyms - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
        • 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 15:30:24 +0800) - Re: PGP and pseudonyms - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>

Re: The Joy of Java

• 1996-04-29 (Mon, 29 Apr 1996 20:36:01 +0800) - Re: The Joy of Java - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1996-04-29 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 05:05:16 +0800) - Re: The Joy of Java - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
  • 1996-04-30 (Tue, 30 Apr 1996 13:53:29 +0800) - Re: The Joy of Java - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

“lite” version of cpunks available?

• 1996-08-06 (Tue, 6 Aug 1996 11:46:08 +0800) - “lite” version of cpunks available? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
  • 1996-08-07 (Wed, 7 Aug 1996 21:10:50 +0800) - Re: “lite” version of cpunks available? - Ray Arachelian <sunder@dorsai.dorsai.org>
  • 1996-08-07 (Wed, 7 Aug 1996 21:45:52 +0800) - Re: “lite” version of cpunks available? - Ray Arachelian <sunder@amanda.dorsai.org>

towards an eternity service

• 1996-09-09 (Mon, 9 Sep 1996 11:22:49 +0800) - towards an eternity service - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1996-09-10 (Tue, 10 Sep 1996 09:36:04 +0800) - Re: towards an eternity service - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re:really undetectable crypto made somewhat practical

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-09-19 (Thu, 19 Sep 1996 17:50:33 +0800) - Re:really undetectable crypto made somewhat practical - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
    • 1996-09-24 (Tue, 24 Sep 1996 17:35:18 +0800) - Re: really undetectable crypto made somewhat practical - Jim Miller <jim@suite.suite.com>

Public domain SHA-1 in C

• 1996-09-27 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 10:16:02 +0800) - Public domain SHA-1 in C - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
  • 1996-09-27 (Fri, 27 Sep 1996 13:28:21 +0800) - Re: Public domain SHA-1 in C - Eric Young <eay@mincom.oz.au>

Re: Public domain SHA-1 in C

• 1996-09-28 (Sat, 28 Sep 1996 10:43:47 +0800) - Re: Public domain SHA-1 in C - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Q.E.D.

• Unknown thread root
  • 1996-10-17 (Wed, 16 Oct 1996 18:30:42 -0700 (PDT)) - Q.E.D. - IPG Sales <ipgsales@cyberstation.net>
    • 1996-10-17 (Wed, 16 Oct 1996 19:40:25 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Q.E.D. - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1996-10-17 (Wed, 16 Oct 1996 22:18:13 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Q.E.D. - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
    • 1996-10-17 (Thu, 17 Oct 1996 16:27:07 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Q.E.D. - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
    • 1996-10-18 (Thu, 17 Oct 1996 20:40:30 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Q.E.D. - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>

Re: Netescrow & Remailers?

• 1996-10-24 (Wed, 23 Oct 1996 21:17:47 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: Netescrow & Remailers? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Another possible remailer attack?

• 1996-11-09 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 14:35:28 -0800 (PST)) - Another possible remailer attack? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
  • 1996-11-10 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 17:58:35 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Another possible remailer attack? - “Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1996-11-10 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 20:10:33 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Another possible remailer attack? - ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)

Re: Another possible remailer attack?

• 1996-11-10 (Sun, 10 Nov 1996 13:43:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Another possible remailer attack? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal

• 1996-11-17 (Sat, 16 Nov 1996 20:26:12 -0800 (PST)) - Re: PGP3.0 & ElGamal - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

Re: Is /dev/random good enough to generate one-time pads?

• 1996-11-29 (Thu, 28 Nov 1996 16:27:33 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Is /dev/random good enough to generate one-time pads? - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
  • 1996-11-29 (Thu, 28 Nov 1996 20:24:08 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Is /dev/random good enough to generate one-time pads? - The Deviant <deviant@pooh-corner.com>

RSA key generation in 13 lines of Perl

• 1996-12-01 (Sun, 1 Dec 1996 14:19:26 -0800 (PST)) - RSA key generation in 13 lines of Perl - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>

The Upcoming DES Challenge

• 1997-01-07 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 18:56:59 -0800 (PST)) - The Upcoming DES Challenge - mpd@netcom.com (Mike Duvos)
  • 1997-01-07 (Mon, 6 Jan 1997 20:57:31 -0800 (PST)) - Re: The Upcoming DES Challenge - Steve Reid <steve@edmweb.com>
    • 1997-01-07 (Tue, 7 Jan 1997 06:09:41 -0800 (PST)) - Re: The Upcoming DES Challenge - Bernie Doehner <bad@uhf.wireless.net>