1997-01-08 - Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks “moderation” experiment in Jan

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: 4983d96861092df244b01ea4b089505f42a7ad522cdcb90af86a9350d288f44c
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.970108165707.25470B-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970108130901.28929H-100000@crl.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-08 21:59:47 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 13:59:47 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 13:59:47 -0800 (PST)
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: Sandy and I will run a cypherpunks "moderation" experiment in Jan
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.970108130901.28929H-100000@crl.crl.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.970108165707.25470B-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Sandy Sandfort wrote:

> C'punks,
> On Sun, 5 Jan 1997, Black Unicorn wrote:
> > How will borderline posts be dealt with?  Posts that contain a great deal
> > of content and thoughful discussion and still manage to contain flames?
> > 
> > Will flames be an automatic boot for a post (zero tolerance), or will they
> > be balanced against post content?
> Zero tolerance will be my first approximation.  I may modify 
> that as I see how things really work out.  So far, though, I
> don't recall see any of those "high content with flames" animals.
> Most posts are one or the other.

Haven't you been reading my stuff?

Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures
Finger for Public Key   Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern
Vote Monarchist         Switzerland