Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com> (25 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5?

• 1997-10-08 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 06:06:58 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
  • 1997-10-09 (Thu, 9 Oct 1997 08:14:39 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-10 (Fri, 10 Oct 1997 11:40:51 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
  • 1997-10-13 (Mon, 13 Oct 1997 16:22:01 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
    • 1997-10-13 (Mon, 13 Oct 1997 17:32:20 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@best.com>

Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5?

• 1997-10-09 (Fri, 10 Oct 1997 07:13:15 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
  • 1997-10-10 (Fri, 10 Oct 1997 18:51:06 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-13 (Mon, 13 Oct 1997 17:30:48 +0800) - Re: What’s really in PGP 5.5? - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>

Technical Description of PGP 5.5

• 1997-10-15 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 16:08:40 +0800) - Technical Description of PGP 5.5 - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1997-10-15 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 22:46:09 +0800) - Re: Technical Description of PGP 5.5 - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
  • 1997-10-23 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 14:58:30 +0800) - Re: Technical Description of PGP 5.5 - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
    • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:36:22 +0800) - Re: Technical Description of PGP 5.5 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 16:39:17 +0800) - Re: Technical Description of PGP 5.5 - “Thomas Junker” <tjunker@mail.phoenix.net>
      • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 22:51:14 +0800) - Re: Technical Description of PGP 5.5 - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
        • 1997-10-27 (Tue, 28 Oct 1997 02:34:46 +0800) - Re: Technical Description of PGP 5.5 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-25 (Sun, 26 Oct 1997 02:08:17 +0800) - Re: Technical Description of PGP 5.5 - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>

proposal: commercial data recovery

• 1997-10-14 (Tue, 14 Oct 1997 17:58:11 +0800) - proposal: commercial data recovery - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-14 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 00:25:46 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
    • 1997-10-14 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 02:42:53 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-14 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 05:21:13 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Rick Smith <smith@securecomputing.com>
    • 1997-10-14 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 06:58:44 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 00:44:55 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Rick Smith <smith@securecomputing.com>
  • 1997-10-15 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 17:38:36 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Will Price <wprice@pgp.com>
    • 1997-10-15 (Wed, 15 Oct 1997 19:14:42 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - Ian Brown <I.Brown@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:11:27 +0800) - anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:22:50 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Gene Hoffman <hoffmang@pgp.com>
        • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 15:43:42 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 10:19:56 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
      • 1997-10-16 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 02:10:28 +0800) - PGP Inc apology deal (was Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-16 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 02:39:35 +0800) - PGP Inc apology deal (Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 11:52:29 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
      • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 21:53:42 +0800) - re. GAK resistant design principles: worked example #1 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 17:54:15 +0800) - Praise the Lord! / Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
    • 1997-10-16 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 02:04:16 +0800) - Re: Praise the Lord! / Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Jon Callas <jon@pgp.com>
    • 1997-10-17 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 17:11:04 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
      • 1997-10-17 (Sat, 18 Oct 1997 01:46:57 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-18 (Sat, 18 Oct 1997 16:58:04 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
        • 1997-10-18 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 05:29:33 +0800) - Re: anti-GAK design principles: worked example #1 - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 06:44:29 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - “Richard Johnson” <rdump@river.com>
  • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 07:26:44 +0800) - Re: proposal: commercial data recovery - stewarts@ix.netcom.com

Re: FCPUNX:PGP Key Escrow and Congress

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 02:24:31 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:PGP Key Escrow and Congress - Eli Brandt <eli@gs160.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
    • 1997-10-15 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 02:46:21 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:PGP Key Escrow and Congress - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 13:35:44 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:PGP Key Escrow and Congress - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
      • 1997-10-17 (Fri, 17 Oct 1997 23:51:34 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:PGP Key Escrow and Congress - “Attila T. Hun” <attila@hun.org>
    • 1997-10-16 (Thu, 16 Oct 1997 13:52:00 +0800) - Re: FCPUNX:PGP Key Escrow and Congress - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>

Re: Is PGP still private?

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-10-18 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 00:35:32 +0800) - Re: Is PGP still private? - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
    • 1997-10-18 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 05:32:40 +0800) - Re: Is PGP still private? - Andrew Bromage <bromage@cs.mu.oz.au>
    • 1997-10-18 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 05:39:22 +0800) - jurisdictional interactions (Re: Is PGP still private?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-20 (Mon, 20 Oct 1997 15:19:31 +0800) - Re: Is PGP still private? - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>

Re: Is PGP still private?

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-10-18 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 06:15:29 +0800) - Re: Is PGP still private? - Toto <toto@sk.sympatico.ca>
    • 1997-10-19 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 17:32:41 +0800) - why we are arguing for more resistant variants (Re: Is PGP still private?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-19 (Mon, 20 Oct 1997 01:10:56 +0800) - GAT & GAB - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
    • 1997-10-19 (Mon, 20 Oct 1997 01:15:38 +0800) - Re: why we are arguing for more resistant variants (Re: Is PGP still private?) - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
      • 1997-10-19 (Mon, 20 Oct 1997 03:19:22 +0800) - Re: why we are arguing for more resistant variants (Re: Is PGP still private?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-20 (Mon, 20 Oct 1997 14:55:37 +0800) - Re: why we are arguing for more resistant variants - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>

Singapore TOILET ALERT

• 1997-10-22 (Wed, 22 Oct 1997 22:27:25 +0800) - Singapore TOILET ALERT - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  • 1997-10-22 (Wed, 22 Oct 1997 23:10:14 +0800) - puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 02:06:19 +0800) - PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 03:31:57 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 02:24:11 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Jonah Seiger <jseiger@cdt.org>
      • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:45:15 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 07:33:49 +0800) - Adam Back: Guardian of CP purity? (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
      • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:40:28 +0800) - Re: Adam Back: Guardian of CP purity? (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 00:03:22 +0800) - Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT - Harish Pillay <harish@ganymede.contact.com.sg>
  • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 00:31:37 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILETALERT) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 02:41:58 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:48:01 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
        • 1997-10-24 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 00:18:09 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET - lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 03:05:01 +0800) - Singaporean control freaks & CMR (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-23 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:09:44 +0800) - Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - Harish Pillay <harish@ganymede.contact.com.sg>
        • 1997-10-23 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 00:57:55 +0800) - Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
          • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 09:29:24 +0800) - Re: Singaporean control freaks & CMR (Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues) - Harish Pillay <harish@ganymede.contact.com.sg>
    • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 04:12:26 +0800) - GMR vs. GAK - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-10-23 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 09:00:09 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
      • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:35:49 +0800) - Re: puff pieces vs tough crypto issues (Re: Singapore TOILET ALERT) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking?

• 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 06:21:00 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - spencer_ante@webmagazine.com
  • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 06:29:10 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1997-10-22 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 06:49:17 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  • 1997-10-23 (Thu, 23 Oct 1997 09:04:19 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
    • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:34:51 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
      • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:26:23 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
        • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 18:23:15 +0800) - not escrowing signature keys (Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking?) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
          • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 19:41:49 +0800) - Re: not escrowing signature keys (Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking?) - Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
    • 1997-10-25 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 15:32:35 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
      • 1997-10-25 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 19:30:12 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
  • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:57:04 +0800) - Re: PGP, Inc.–What were they thinking? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Re: PGP Employee on MKR

• 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 19:55:36 +0800) - Re: PGP Employee on MKR - mark@unicorn.com
  • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 22:39:47 +0800) - Re: PGP Employee on MKR - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>

Re: PGP Employee on MKR

• 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 21:25:52 +0800) - Re: PGP Employee on MKR - mark@unicorn.com
  • 1997-10-24 (Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:54:20 +0800) - Re: PGP Employee on MKR - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
  • 1997-10-24 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 01:30:52 +0800) - GMR in the talked-about form here would be unconstitutional - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-10-24 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 02:13:58 +0800) - Re: GMR in the talked-about form here would be unconstitutional - lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
    • 1997-10-24 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 03:09:52 +0800) - unconstitutional? try this variant…(Re: GMR in the talked-about form here would be unconstitutional) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
    • 1997-10-28 (Tue, 28 Oct 1997 19:00:26 +0800) - Re: unconstitutional? try this variant…(Re: GMR in the talked-about form here would be unconstitutional) - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>

Re: PGP Employee on MKR

• 1997-10-24 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 05:48:02 +0800) - Re: PGP Employee on MKR - harka@nycmetro.com
  • 1997-10-24 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 06:50:34 +0800) - Re: PGP Employee on MKR - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
  • 1997-10-25 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 08:21:22 +0800) - Saving money - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1997-10-25 (Sat, 25 Oct 1997 14:10:13 +0800) - Re: Saving money - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>

Orthogonality and Disaster Recovery (fwd)

• 1997-10-25 (Sun, 26 Oct 1997 05:07:14 +0800) - Orthogonality and Disaster Recovery (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
  • 1997-10-26 (Sun, 26 Oct 1997 15:41:01 +0800) - Re: Orthogonality and Disaster Recovery (fwd) - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>

Orthogonality and Disaster Recovery

• 1997-10-25 (Sun, 26 Oct 1997 04:52:33 +0800) - Orthogonality and Disaster Recovery - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1997-10-26 (Sun, 26 Oct 1997 16:40:33 +0800) - Re: Orthogonality and Disaster Recovery - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
  • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 18:17:01 +0800) - Re: Orthogonality and Disaster Recovery - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>

Orthogonal

• 1997-10-26 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:22:27 +0800) - Orthogonal - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
  • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 08:44:05 +0800) - Re: Orthogonal - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>

Re: Orthogonal (fwd)

• 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 08:48:40 +0800) - Re: Orthogonal (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
  • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 11:22:25 +0800) - Re: Orthogonal (fwd) - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
  • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 14:44:52 +0800) - Re: Orthogonal (fwd) - Mark Rogaski <wendigo@ne-wendigo.jabberwock.org>

Re: CMR versus GAK?

• 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 20:48:01 +0800) - Re: CMR versus GAK? - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
  • 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 23:15:10 +0800) - Re: CMR versus GAK? - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
  • 1997-10-29 (Wed, 29 Oct 1997 14:56:50 +0800) - Re: CMR versus GAK? - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1997-10-29 (Wed, 29 Oct 1997 15:53:52 +0800) - Re: CMR versus GAK? - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>

Re: Orthogonal (fwd)

• 1997-10-27 (Mon, 27 Oct 1997 13:41:21 +0800) - Re: Orthogonal (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
  • 1997-10-27 (Tue, 28 Oct 1997 00:57:20 +0800) - Re: Orthogonal (fwd) - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
  • 1997-10-27 (Tue, 28 Oct 1997 01:44:15 +0800) - Re: Orthogonal (fwd) - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>

Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds (Re: Tim’s worst nightmare.,..)

• 1997-10-29 (Wed, 29 Oct 1997 12:20:28 +0800) - Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds (Re: Tim’s worst nightmare.,..) - Secret Squirrel <nobody@secret.squirrel.owl.de>
  • 1997-10-29 (Wed, 29 Oct 1997 12:37:33 +0800) - Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds (Re: Tim’s worst nightmare.,..) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1997-10-29 (Wed, 29 Oct 1997 12:44:57 +0800) - Re: [cpe:3185] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds (Re: Tim’s worst nightmare.,..) - graycastle@ppw.net
      • 1997-10-29 (Wed, 29 Oct 1997 13:13:45 +0800) - Re: [cpe:3185] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds (Re: Tim’s worst nightmare.,..) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
      • 1997-10-29 (Wed, 29 Oct 1997 19:59:07 +0800) - Re: [cpe:3185] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds (Re: Tim’s worst nightmare.,..) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
        • 1997-10-29 (Thu, 30 Oct 1997 07:26:40 +0800) - Re: [cpx:709] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds (Re: Tim’s worst nightmare.,..) - Yoshiwara Remailer <yr@dev.null>
      • 1997-10-29 (Wed, 29 Oct 1997 23:39:32 +0800) - Re: [cpe:3185] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
        • 1997-10-29 (Thu, 30 Oct 1997 02:39:16 +0800) - Re: [cpe:3185] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
        • 1997-10-29 (Thu, 30 Oct 1997 02:46:13 +0800) - Re: [cpe:3185] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
          • 1997-10-29 (Thu, 30 Oct 1997 05:45:36 +0800) - Re: [cpe:3185] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds - Eric Cordian <emc@wire.insync.net>
            • 1997-10-29 (Thu, 30 Oct 1997 06:30:23 +0800) - Re: [cpe:3185] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
          • 1997-10-30 (Thu, 30 Oct 1997 21:22:17 +0800) - Re: [cpe:3185] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
            • 1997-10-30 (Thu, 30 Oct 1997 21:34:38 +0800) - Re: [cpe:3185] Re: rescue Mrs Allen from the Feds - Chief CypherPunks Spokesperson <ccs@dev.null>

Re: Jim Bell sentencing delayed

• 1997-10-31 (Fri, 31 Oct 1997 20:05:21 +0800) - Re: Jim Bell sentencing delayed - John Young <jya@pipeline.com>
  • 1997-10-31 (Fri, 31 Oct 1997 21:38:42 +0800) - Re: Jim Bell sentencing delayed - Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
  • 1997-10-31 (Sat, 1 Nov 1997 02:10:55 +0800) - Re: Jim Bell sentencing delayed - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1997-11-03 (Mon, 3 Nov 1997 18:01:09 +0800) - Re: Jim Bell sentencing delayed - Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>