Lizard <lizard@dnai.com> (22 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

Re: The Real Plan: Making the Net Safe for Censorship

• 1997-07-16 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 07:57:48 +0800) - Re: The Real Plan: Making the Net Safe for Censorship - “Ross Wright” <rwright@adnetsol.com>
  • 1997-07-17 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 09:22:13 +0800) - Re: The Real Plan: Making the Net Safe for Censorship - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-07-17 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 11:43:01 +0800) - Re: The Real Plan: Making the Net Safe for Censorship - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
      • 1997-07-17 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 15:50:42 +0800) - Re: The Real Plan: Making the Net Safe for Censorship - “Attila T. Hun” <attila@primenet.com>

Re: The Real Plan: Making the Net Safe for Censorship

• 1997-07-17 (Thu, 17 Jul 1997 13:06:39 +0800) - Re: The Real Plan: Making the Net Safe for Censorship - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>

Keepers of the keys

• 1997-07-18 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 04:17:25 +0800) - Keepers of the keys - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
  • 1997-07-18 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 05:21:31 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 10:29:36 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
    • 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 13:21:22 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 22:58:31 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
      • 1997-07-19 (Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:38:06 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-07-19 (Sun, 20 Jul 1997 04:40:22 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
      • 1997-07-20 (Mon, 21 Jul 1997 02:57:50 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
        • 1997-07-20 (Mon, 21 Jul 1997 07:28:50 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Alan <alan@ctrl-alt-del.com>
      • 1997-07-21 (Mon, 21 Jul 1997 08:21:56 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
        • 1997-07-23 (Thu, 24 Jul 1997 07:11:53 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
      • 1997-07-21 (Tue, 22 Jul 1997 01:25:01 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
      • 1997-07-22 (Tue, 22 Jul 1997 09:31:46 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
        • 1997-07-22 (Wed, 23 Jul 1997 00:34:22 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Ray Arachelian <sunder@brainlink.com>
        • 1997-09-15 (Tue, 16 Sep 1997 03:34:25 +0800) - Re: Tim May on “The People” - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
          • 1997-09-22 (Mon, 22 Sep 1997 14:17:44 +0800) - Re: Tim May on “The People” - “snow” <snow@smoke.suba.com>
      • 1997-07-22 (Wed, 23 Jul 1997 02:28:04 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
      • 1997-07-22 (Wed, 23 Jul 1997 03:18:19 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
    • 1997-07-19 (Sun, 20 Jul 1997 00:00:47 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Marshall Clow <mclow@owl.csusm.edu>
  • 1997-07-18 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 05:39:39 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Colin Rafferty <craffert@ml.com>
  • 1997-07-18 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:21:40 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
    • 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 09:15:23 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>
  • 1997-07-18 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 06:55:38 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Steve Schear <azur@netcom.com>
  • 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 08:06:04 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Koro <ksahin@best.com>
  • 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 11:27:32 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 14:03:02 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
  • 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 11:42:00 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 12:29:42 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Joe Shea <joeshea@netcom.com>
    • 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 13:14:49 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-07-19 (Sun, 20 Jul 1997 03:47:04 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>

Re: Keepers of the keys

• 1997-07-19 (Sat, 19 Jul 1997 13:39:12 +0800) - Re: Keepers of the keys - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>

Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no b

• 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 12:04:57 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no b - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
  • 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 12:02:52 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no b - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no b

• 1997-09-10 (Wed, 10 Sep 1997 12:16:16 +0800) - Re: House National Security committee guts SAFE, worse than no b - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>

Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights

• 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:51:12 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
  • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 23:33:47 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Glenn Hauman <hauman@bb.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 04:52:41 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Fuck You <fu@dev.null>
      • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 05:21:01 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
        • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 10:01:10 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Fuck You <fu@dev.null>
  • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 02:37:10 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 03:37:24 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>

Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights

• 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 10:10:53 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Syniker@aol.com
  • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:55:39 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:18:03 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - David H Dennis <david@amazing.com>
      • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:24:18 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 15:20:00 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Fuck You <fy@dev.null>
      • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 03:10:36 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
      • 1997-09-13 (Sun, 14 Sep 1997 01:06:22 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Doug Geiger <runexe@ntplx.net>
      • 1997-09-14 (Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:51:57 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Jon Lebkowsky <jonl@onr.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:22:45 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - “James S. Tyre” <j.s.tyre@worldnet.att.net>
      • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:27:47 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 00:28:41 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Glenn Hauman <hauman@bb.com>
        • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 02:33:33 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 13:56:47 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 01:19:53 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
        • 1997-09-15 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 15:10:06 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
          • 1997-09-15 (Tue, 16 Sep 1997 00:46:22 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
            • 1997-09-21 (Sun, 21 Sep 1997 14:59:17 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - fnorky@geocities.com (Douglas L. Peterson)
      • 1997-09-15 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 13:08:00 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - fnorky@geocities.com (Douglas L. Peterson)
        • 1997-09-15 (Tue, 16 Sep 1997 01:33:07 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - sameer <sameer@c2.net>
          • 1997-09-15 (Tue, 16 Sep 1997 07:23:39 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
          • 1997-09-16 (Tue, 16 Sep 1997 14:20:46 +0800) - Re: PGP Usability - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
        • 1997-09-15 (Tue, 16 Sep 1997 02:02:39 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
          • 1997-09-22 (Mon, 22 Sep 1997 14:38:46 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional - “snow” <snow@smoke.suba.com>
        • 1997-09-19 (Fri, 19 Sep 1997 11:32:03 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - fnorky@geocities.com (Douglas L. Peterson)
        • 1997-09-22 (Mon, 22 Sep 1997 13:56:48 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - “snow” <snow@smoke.suba.com>
        • 1997-09-22 (Mon, 22 Sep 1997 14:51:14 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Alan <alan@ctrl-alt-del.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 14:21:39 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - “James S. Tyre” <j.s.tyre@worldnet.att.net>
    • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 21:54:56 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - “J. Lasser” <jonl@post.goucher.edu>
    • 1997-09-12 (Fri, 12 Sep 1997 23:35:33 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Glenn Hauman <hauman@bb.com>
      • 1997-09-14 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 02:39:12 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - jonathon <grafolog@netcom.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 00:37:22 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
      • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 03:09:01 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 04:20:41 +0800) - Liberals and their tacit support for a national security state - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
      • 1997-09-13 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 08:02:43 +0800) - Re: Liberals and their tacit support for a national security state - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-09-12 (Sat, 13 Sep 1997 05:04:49 +0800) - WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU PEOPLE? / Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - Fuck You <fu@dev.null>
    • 1997-09-15 (Mon, 15 Sep 1997 12:52:25 +0800) - Re: The problem of playing politics with our constitutional rights - fnorky@geocities.com (Douglas L. Peterson)

Re: ALERT: On Monday, call Congress to stop Big Brother amendment!

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-09-18 (Fri, 19 Sep 1997 07:01:50 +0800) - Re: ALERT: On Monday, call Congress to stop Big Brother amendment! - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>

What will it cost to let Big Brother watch?

• 1997-09-22 (Tue, 23 Sep 1997 00:20:29 +0800) - What will it cost to let Big Brother watch? - Declan McCullagh <Declan_McCullagh@timemagazine.com>
  • 1997-09-22 (Tue, 23 Sep 1997 00:52:44 +0800) - Re: What will it cost to let Big Brother watch? - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-09-22 (Tue, 23 Sep 1997 04:16:33 +0800) - Re: What will it cost to let Big Brother watch? - Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>

Re: The Telcos oppose Oxley

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-09-25 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 09:40:45 +0800) - Re: The Telcos oppose Oxley - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-09-25 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 11:38:22 +0800) - Re: The Telcos oppose Oxley - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-09-25 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 18:24:31 +0800) - Re: The Telcos oppose Oxley - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
    • 1997-09-25 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 23:31:23 +0800) - Re: The Telcos oppose Oxley - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>

Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)

• 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:38:16 +0800) - Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:12:14 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:25:42 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:57:19 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
      • 1997-09-27 (Sun, 28 Sep 1997 01:21:11 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - nospam-seesignature@ceddec.com
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:06:08 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Jeff Barber <jeffb@issl.atl.hp.com>
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:09:11 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 03:55:29 +0800) - Re: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>

Re: Oxley Amendment

• 1997-09-25 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 14:01:38 +0800) - Re: Oxley Amendment - Lee Tien <tien@well.com>
  • 1997-09-25 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 14:51:38 +0800) - Re: Oxley Amendment - Lucky Green <shamrock@cypherpunks.to>
    • 1997-09-25 (Thu, 25 Sep 1997 17:54:23 +0800) - Pissing on the Parade / Re: Oxley Amendment - A Player To Be Named Later <aptbnl@dev.null>
  • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:25:21 +0800) - How the FBI/NSA forces can further twist SAFE - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
    • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:24:07 +0800) - Re: How the FBI/NSA forces can further twist SAFE - “Brock N. Meeks” <brock@well.com>
    • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:44:35 +0800) - Re: How the FBI/NSA forces can further twist SAFE - Alan <alan@ctrl-alt-del.com>
    • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 02:47:42 +0800) - Re: How the FBI/NSA forces can further twist SAFE - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 06:27:15 +0800) - Re: How the FBI/NSA forces can further twist SAFE - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman

• 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 09:36:58 +0800) - Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
  • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 10:15:04 +0800) - Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman - Jodi Hoffman <jlhoffm@ibm.net>
    • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 10:42:33 +0800) - Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
      • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 11:11:53 +0800) - jargon generator - Gabriel Millerd <millerd@vhoorl.rli-net.net>
    • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 10:51:33 +0800) - Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
    • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 11:41:23 +0800) - Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
  • 1997-11-04 (Tue, 4 Nov 1997 10:29:42 +0800) - Re: Why porn must be stopped at all costs, by Jodi Hoffman - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)

Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article)

• Unknown thread root
  • 1997-12-03 (Wed, 3 Dec 1997 23:55:28 +0800) - Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
    • 1997-12-03 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 03:03:41 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-12-03 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 03:16:01 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - David Honig <honig@otc.net>
    • 1997-12-03 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 06:18:36 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - James Love <love@cptech.org>
      • 1997-12-03 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 07:30:08 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@vorlon.mit.edu>
        • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 08:10:21 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - James Love <love@cptech.org>
          • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:15:17 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
            • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 08:34:01 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - James Love <love@cptech.org>
              • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:35:30 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
                • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:37:08 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
                • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 19:17:02 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
                  • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 18:51:19 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - frissell@panix.com
                  • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 22:06:26 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
                  • 1997-12-08 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 10:01:09 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Jon Galt <jongalt@pinn.net>
                • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 04:16:45 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “J. Lasser” <jon@lasser.org>
                  • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 08:46:37 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
                    • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 22:51:18 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
                    • 1997-12-05 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 04:40:51 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
                      • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 08:07:26 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
                      • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 09:04:00 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
                      • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 14:01:16 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
                    • 1997-12-05 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 06:34:18 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
                      • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 11:03:38 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
                  • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 10:09:21 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
                    • 1997-12-05 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 03:54:35 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
                  • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 10:19:54 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@pathfinder.com>
                • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 10:26:41 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - frissell@panix.com
                • 1997-12-26 (Sat, 27 Dec 1997 01:51:39 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
              • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 15:16:21 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
                • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 16:11:33 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
            • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 18:50:48 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - berezina@qed.net (Paul Spirito)
          • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 10:19:10 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
        • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 08:39:06 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - James Love <love@cptech.org>
        • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 11:22:11 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting testicle) - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
          • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 02:05:47 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting testicle) - Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
            • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 03:30:16 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting testicle) - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
      • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 18:02:32 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:06:14 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - David Honig <honig@otc.net>
    • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 09:39:34 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 11:54:26 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - James Love <love@cptech.org>
      • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 13:29:31 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
        • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 01:50:42 +0800) - Kudos to ‘my other brother’ BillyG / Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
      • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 14:37:20 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 14:14:14 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>

Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article)

• 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 19:56:57 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Jay Holovacs <holovacs@idt.net>
  • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 21:21:30 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 21:28:16 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - tom <tom@Empire.Net>
      • 1997-12-04 (Thu, 4 Dec 1997 22:32:58 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
      • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 03:30:41 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - David Honig <honig@otc.net>
        • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 05:54:04 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>
    • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 03:06:51 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - David Honig <honig@otc.net>
    • 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 11:00:50 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz+@cmu.edu>
  • 1997-12-04 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 06:04:19 +0800) - Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>

RE: Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article)

• 1997-12-05 (Fri, 5 Dec 1997 22:28:40 +0800) - RE: Re: Censorial leftists (Was: Interesting article) - jay holovacs <holovacs@idt.net>
  • 1997-12-05 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 03:05:16 +0800) - Singapore - Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
    • 1997-12-05 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 02:59:58 +0800) - Re: Singapore - Hallam-Baker <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
      • 1997-12-05 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 03:26:04 +0800) - Re: Singapore - TruthMonger <tm@dev.null>
    • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 09:25:15 +0800) - Re: Singapore - Peter Herngaard <pethern@inet.uni2.dk>
      • 1997-12-07 (Sun, 7 Dec 1997 17:36:34 +0800) - Re: Singapore - Harish Pillay <harish@brokat.com.sg>
        • 1997-12-08 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 15:55:20 +0800) - Re: Singapore - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
    • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 09:52:08 +0800) - Hate speech in Germany… - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
      • 1997-12-06 (Sat, 6 Dec 1997 10:56:54 +0800) - Re: Hate speech in Germany… - Peter Herngaard <pethern@inet.uni2.dk>
    • 1997-12-08 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 12:31:11 +0800) - Re: Singapore and Germany - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
  • 1997-12-08 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 12:31:21 +0800) - Re: Singapore - Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
    • 1997-12-09 (Wed, 10 Dec 1997 00:08:35 +0800) - Re: Singapore - ulf@fitug.de (Ulf =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?=)

Re: Singapore

• 1997-12-06 (Sun, 7 Dec 1997 01:52:50 +0800) - Re: Singapore - “Phillip M. Hallam-Baker” <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
  • 1997-12-07 (Sun, 7 Dec 1997 17:27:46 +0800) - Re: Singapore - Harish Pillay <harish@brokat.com.sg>
    • 1997-12-08 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 09:37:07 +0800) - Re: Singapore - Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
    • 1997-12-08 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 10:06:59 +0800) - Re: Singapore - ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au>
      • 1997-12-08 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 11:03:31 +0800) - Re: Singapore - Harish Pillay <harish@brokat.com.sg>
  • 1997-12-07 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 07:51:42 +0800) - Re: Singapore - Lizard <lizard@dnai.com>
    • 1997-12-08 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 10:45:18 +0800) - Re: Singapore - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1997-12-08 (Mon, 8 Dec 1997 10:08:19 +0800) - Re: Singapore - frissell@panix.com